Following Recent Decline, Halo Microelectronics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688173) Top Shareholder CEO Hai Tao Sees Holdings Value Drop by 8.5%
Following Recent Decline, Halo Microelectronics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688173) Top Shareholder CEO Hai Tao Sees Holdings Value Drop by 8.5%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Halo Microelectronics implies vested interests in company growth
- 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- Halo微電子公司內部控制力量巨大,意味着公司增長利益深厚
- 業務的52%由前4大股東持有。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Halo Microelectronics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688173), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解Halo微電子股份有限公司(SHSE:688173)真正控制權的人是誰,重要的是要了解企業的所有權結構。持有公司大部分股份的集團,具體來說約佔43%,是個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲益最多(或者如果出現下滑則損失最多)。
And following last week's 8.5% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
在上週股價下跌了8.5%之後,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Halo Microelectronics.
在下面的圖表中,我們對Halo Microelectronics的不同所有權群體進行了放大。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Halo Microelectronics?
機構持股告訴我們有關Halo Microelectronics的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Halo Microelectronics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Halo Microelectronics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到Halo Microelectronics確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股份的一大部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在它們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以查看Halo Microelectronics的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Halo Microelectronics. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Hai Tao with 23% of shares outstanding. Ya Tang is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Chongqing Weichun Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd. holds about 9.2% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Ya Tang is also Chief Financial Officer, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
對沖基金在Halo Microelectronics中持有的股份不多。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是CEO海濤,持有23%的股份。第二大股東是持有14%普通股的股東Ya Tang,重慶偉純企業管理諮詢有限公司持有公司股份的約9.2%。有趣的是,第二大股東Ya Tang也是首席財務官,再次表明公司高管是公司前幾大股東之一。
On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察發現,前四名股東持有52%的股份。換句話說,這些股東對該公司的決策有重要的發言權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Halo Microelectronics
Halo Microelectronics的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Halo Microelectronics Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.0b stake in this CN¥4.7b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人士擁有Halo Microelectronics Co., Ltd.的相當比例。 內部人士在這家47億人民幣的企業中持有20億人民幣的股份。看到內部人士如此投入業務,真是太好了。也許值得查看一下這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Halo Microelectronics. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆擁有Halo Microelectronics 25% 的股份,主要由個人投資者組成。雖然這個群體不能必然控制公司的決策,但確實可以對公司的運營產生實質影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 5.0%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
擁有5.0%所有權的股權投資公司有機會在塑造企業戰略方面發揮作用,重點是價值創造。有些人可能會喜歡這種情況,因爲股權投資有時是持有管理層責任的激進分子。但其他時候,股權投資公司可能在拋售股份,將公司上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 20%, of the Halo Microelectronics stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
私營公司似乎擁有Halo Microelectronics股票的20%。深入研究這個可能是值得的。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一個私人公司中有利益,這應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Halo Microelectronics better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Halo Microelectronics (1 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Halo Microelectronics,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已發現Halo Microelectronics的2個警告信號(1個不能忽視!)在投資這裏之前,您應該注意這些。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。