share_log

Dongxing Securities Corporation Limited's (SHSE:601198) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 9.9% Last Week

Dongxing Securities Corporation Limited's (SHSE:601198) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 9.9% Last Week

東興證券有限公司(SHSE:601198)的最大股東是私營公司,在股價上漲9.9%上週後變得更富有。
Simply Wall St ·  11/02 10:38

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significant control over Dongxing Securities by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 私人公司對東興證券的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多的影響力來影響管理和治理決策
  • 共有3位投資者在公司中擁有54%的控股權
  • 公司的過往表現以及所有權數據有助於強烈判斷業務的前景

If you want to know who really controls Dongxing Securities Corporation Limited (SHSE:601198), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制東興證券有限公司(SHSE:601198),那麼你需要查看其股東名冊的構成。持有公司最多股份的集團,大約佔56%,具體來說,是私營公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的利益(或者如果出現下跌,將損失最多)。

As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥37b market cap following a 9.9% gain in the stock.

因此,私營企業在上週共同獲得了最高分,因爲該公司的市值達到了370億人民幣,股票上漲了9.9%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Dongxing Securities.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了東興證券的不同所有權集團。

big
SHSE:601198 Ownership Breakdown November 2nd 2024
SHSE:601198 所有權結構 2024年11月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dongxing Securities?

機構持股告訴我們有關東興證券的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

Dongxing Securities already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Dongxing Securities' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

東興證券已經在股票登記冊上有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好謹慎對待對機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證的依賴。機構投資者有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看東興證券的營業收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SHSE:601198 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 2nd 2024
上證所:601198 盈利與營業收入增長 2024年11月2日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Dongxing Securities. China Orient Asset Management Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. Jiangsu Communications Holding Co., Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 4.9% of common stock, and Shandong High-Speed Group Co., Ltd. holds about 3.7% of the company stock.

對沖基金在東興證券的持股不多。 中國東方資產管理有限公司目前是該公司最大股東,持有45%的流通股。 江蘇通信控股有限公司是第二大股東,擁有4.9%的普通股,而山東高速集團有限公司持有約3.7%的公司股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前三大股東在公司中擁有多數股權,意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的觀點以了解市場風向同樣是有意義的。雖然有分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍會變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Dongxing Securities

東興證券的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司管理層負責業務的運行,但CEO需要對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Dongxing Securities Corporation Limited. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥80k worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示,東興證券有限公司的內部人士擁有不到1%的股份。然而,內部人士可能通過更復雜的結構間接持有利益。這是一家相當大的公司,董事會成員可能擁有公司中有意義的股份,而不擁有相當比例的股份。在這種情況下,他們大約擁有價值人民幣8萬的股份(以目前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但值得一提的是,也許值得查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Dongxing Securities. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有37%股份的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對東興證券有一定的影響力。儘管這樣的持股比例可能不足以左右政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 56%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有56%的發行股份。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此有必要了解這些私營公司的所有者。有時內部人員或其他相關方會通過一個獨立的私營公司對一家上市公司的股份產生利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Dongxing Securities (2 are significant) that you should be aware of.

我發現了解究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經識別出東興證券的三個警示信號(其中兩個是重要的),你應該關注這些。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論