Recent 12% Pullback Would Hurt Shenzhen Boshijie Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301608) Insiders
Recent 12% Pullback Would Hurt Shenzhen Boshijie Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301608) Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Shenzhen Boshijie Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 4 shareholders own 55% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 對深圳博世傑科技的顯著內部控制暗示了對公司增長的既得利益
- 前 4 大股東擁有公司的 55% 股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
If you want to know who really controls Shenzhen Boshijie Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301608), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制深圳博世傑科技有限公司(SZSE:301608),那麼你需要查看其股份登記的構成。 持有公司最多股份的集團,準確地說,大約52%,是個人內部人士。 換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
And following last week's 12% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
在上週的12%股價下跌之後,內部人員遭受了最大的虧損。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen Boshijie Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解深圳博士潔科技每種所有者的情況,首先是下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Boshijie Technology?
機構持有會告訴我們什麼關於深圳博士潔科技?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Shenzhen Boshijie Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shenzhen Boshijie Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
深圳博士潔科技的股份登記上已經有機構參與。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這在一定程度上表明瞭專業投資者的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一點,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看深圳博士潔科技的盈利歷史。 當然,未來才是最重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen Boshijie Technology. Xiaoqiang Zhou is currently the company's largest shareholder with 34% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Huizhou Botianyi Investment Consulting Partnership (Limited Partnership) and Huizhou Huibo Technology Co., Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.5%.
我們注意到對深圳博史傑科技的對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。 周小強目前是該公司最大的股東,持有34%的股份。 第二和第三大股東分別是惠州博天逸投資諮詢合夥企業(有限合夥)和惠州匯博科技有限公司,持股比例相同,均爲7.5%。
On looking further, we found that 55% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步查看,我們發現前4大股東擁有該公司55%的股份。換言之,這些股東對公司的決策有着重要的影響。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。分析師觀點也可以達到相同的目的。我們的信息表明,這隻股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,所以它可能不是很出名。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Boshijie Technology
深圳博史傑科技的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Shenzhen Boshijie Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a CN¥2.8b stake in this CN¥5.5b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,深圳博世傑科技有限公司的內部人士持有超過一半的股份。這使他們有效控制了公司。因此,他們在這家價值55億人民幣的企業中持有28億人民幣的股份。看到這樣的投資水平是令人欣慰的。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Shenzhen Boshijie Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個別投資者,持有深圳博世傑科技21%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能夠做主,但確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 22%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到,公共公司擁有上海汽車空調配件的33%股份。很難說得太確定,但這可能表明他們有糾纏的業務利益。這可能是一個戰略性的股權,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shenzhen Boshijie Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Shenzhen Boshijie Technology (at least 2 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解深圳博實傑科技,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,時刻存在的投資風險。 我們已經確定深圳博實傑科技的3個警示信號(至少有2個無法忽視),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。