Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 87% of the Company
Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 87% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cummins' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 19 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構擁有的股份比例高意味着康明斯的股價會對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 前19名股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
Every investor in Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
康明斯公司(紐交所:CMI)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大股份的群體是擁有87%所有權的機構。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或者損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cummins, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解康明斯的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cummins?
機構所有權對於康明斯有何啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Cummins already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cummins' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
康明斯股份註冊表上已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們在一種「擁擠的交易」中的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到康明斯的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更復雜的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cummins. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. With 8.8% and 5.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到對康明斯沒有任何有意義的投資的對沖基金。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,擁有12%的流通股。分別擁有8.8%和5.0%的流通股,BlackRock,Inc. 和 t. Rowe Price Group,Inc. 是第二和第三大股東。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 19 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地看我們的所有權數據表明,前19名股東持有的股份總共佔51%,這意味着沒有單個股東具有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Cummins
康明斯內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Cummins Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$196m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息顯示,康明斯公司的內部人員擁有不到1%公司股份。作爲一家大公司,我們只會期望內部人員擁有很小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值19600萬美元的股份。看到至少有一些內部持股總是好事,但或許值得查看這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cummins. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
作爲一家擁有12%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對康明斯有一定影響力。儘管這種持股比例可能不足以對政策決策產生影響,但他們仍然可以集體對公司政策產生影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cummins better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Cummins that you should be aware of before investing here.
始終值得考慮到公司的不同股東群體。但要更好地理解康明斯,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了一條康明斯的警告信號,投資前您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。