Longshine Technology Group (SZSE:300682) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
Longshine Technology Group (SZSE:300682) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Typically, we'll want to notice a trend of growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and alongside that, an expanding base of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. However, after investigating Longshine Technology Group (SZSE:300682), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.
如果我們想找到一隻可以長期成倍增長的股票,我們應該尋找哪些潛在趨勢?通常,我們會注意到已動用資本回報率(ROCE)的增長趨勢,與此同時,使用的資本基礎也在擴大。這向我們表明,它是一臺複合機器,能夠持續將其收益再投資到業務中併產生更高的回報。但是,在調查了朗欣科技集團(深圳證券交易所代碼:300682)之後,我們認爲目前的趨勢不符合多袋機的模式。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
了解資本使用回報率 (ROCE)
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Longshine Technology Group:
對於那些不知道的人來說,ROCE是衡量公司年度稅前利潤(其回報率)的指標,相對於該業務使用的資本。分析師使用這個公式來計算朗新科技集團的利潤:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益(EBIT)÷(總資產-流動負債)
0.04 = CN¥329m ÷ (CN¥10b - CN¥1.9b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.04 = 32900萬元人民幣 ÷(100元人民幣至19億元人民幣)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
So, Longshine Technology Group has an ROCE of 4.0%. On its own that's a low return, but compared to the average of 2.7% generated by the Software industry, it's much better.
因此,朗新科技集團的投資回報率爲4.0%。就其本身而言,回報率很低,但與軟件行業2.7%的平均回報率相比,要好得多。
In the above chart we have measured Longshine Technology Group's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Longshine Technology Group for free.
在上圖中,我們將朗欣科技集團先前的投資回報率與之前的表現進行了對比,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果你願意,你可以免費查看報道朗欣科技集團的分析師的預測。
How Are Returns Trending?
退貨趨勢如何?
We weren't thrilled with the trend because Longshine Technology Group's ROCE has reduced by 46% over the last five years, while the business employed 97% more capital. Usually this isn't ideal, but given Longshine Technology Group conducted a capital raising before their most recent earnings announcement, that would've likely contributed, at least partially, to the increased capital employed figure. It's unlikely that all of the funds raised have been put to work yet, so as a consequence Longshine Technology Group might not have received a full period of earnings contribution from it.
我們對這一趨勢並不感到興奮,因爲朗欣科技集團的投資回報率在過去五年中下降了46%,而該業務使用的資本增加了97%。通常,這並不理想,但鑑於Longshine Technology Group在發佈最新業績之前進行了融資,這可能至少部分地促進了已動用資本數字的增加。籌集的所有資金尚不太可能全部投入使用,因此,Longshine Technology Group可能尚未從中獲得完整的收益捐款。
The Bottom Line On Longshine Technology Group's ROCE
朗新科技集團投資回報率的底線
To conclude, we've found that Longshine Technology Group is reinvesting in the business, but returns have been falling. And in the last five years, the stock has given away 23% so the market doesn't look too hopeful on these trends strengthening any time soon. Therefore based on the analysis done in this article, we don't think Longshine Technology Group has the makings of a multi-bagger.
總而言之,我們發現Longshine Technology Group正在對該業務進行再投資,但回報率一直在下降。在過去的五年中,該股已經下跌了23%,因此市場對這些趨勢在短期內走強似乎並不抱太大希望。因此,根據本文的分析,我們認爲朗欣科技集團不具備多袋機的優勢。
One more thing to note, we've identified 2 warning signs with Longshine Technology Group and understanding these should be part of your investment process.
還有一件事需要注意,我們已經向朗欣科技集團確定了兩個警告信號,並了解這些信號應該是您投資過程的一部分。
While Longshine Technology Group may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
儘管Longshine Technology Group目前可能無法獲得最高的回報,但我們編制了一份目前股本回報率超過25%的公司清單。在這裏查看這個免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。