Insiders Are the Top Stockholders in Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300616), and the Recent 9.3% Drop Might Have Disappointed Them
Insiders Are the Top Stockholders in Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300616), and the Recent 9.3% Drop Might Have Disappointed Them
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 7 shareholders own 51% of the company
- 12% of Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection is held by Institutions
- 尚品宅配存在着重要的內部控制,意味着對公司增長有着既得利益
- 前7大股東擁有該公司的51%。
- 尚品宅配有12%的股份由機構持有
If you want to know who really controls Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300616), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 45% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想了解誰真正控制着廣州尚品宅配有限公司(SZSE:300616),那麼您需要看看其股權登記簿的構成。 持有最大股份的是擁有45%所有權的個人內部人士。 換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥438m.
結果市值下降43800萬元後,內部人員作爲一個群體遭受了最高的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們什麼關於尚品宅配。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於尚品宅配?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在尚品宅配持有相當大的股份。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看一下尚品宅配下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Lian Zhu Li is the largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.9% by the third-largest shareholder. Two of the top three shareholders happen to be Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. That is, insiders feature higher up in the heirarchy of the company's top shareholders.
尚品宅配不是由對沖基金擁有。我們的數據顯示,連珠麗是最大的股東,持有21%的股份。第二大股東持有約8.0%的流通股份,第三大股東持有7.9%的流通股份。前三大股東中有兩位恰好分別是首席執行官和董事會成員。也就是說,內部人員在公司前三大股東中佔據較高的地位。
We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前7名股東擁有超過一半的股份登記冊,還有一些小股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection
尚品宅配的內部人員持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.7b, and insiders have CN¥1.2b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有廣州尚品宅配有限公司的股份比例合理。其市值僅爲27億人民幣,內部人士名下持有價值12億人民幣的股票。看到內部人士如此投入業務是件好事。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通投資者,包括零售投資者,持有公司39%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然此種控股規模相當大,但如果與其他大型股東的決策不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 4.5% of Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
目前,上市公司持有廣州尚品宅配4.5%的股份。這可能是一種戰略利益,這兩家公司可能存在相關的業務利益。可能是它們進行了分拆。這種持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Guangzhou Shangpin Home Collection , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮到持有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有更重要的因素。比如,始終存在的投資風險。我們已經發現了廣州尚品宅配的3個警示信號,了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。