share_log

Recent 4.9% Pullback Would Hurt Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) Insiders

Recent 4.9% Pullback Would Hurt Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) Insiders

最近4.9%的回撤會對史丹利農業集團股份有限公司(SZSE:002588)內部人員造成損失
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/05 07:34

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 史丹利農業集團有限公司的重要內部控制意味着對公司增長的利益相關者
  • 該公司的前五大股東擁有51%的股份。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002588) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 58% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

史丹利農業集團股份有限公司(SZSE:002588)的每位投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。持有最大股份的群體是擁有58%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥426m.

因此,在市值下降了人民幣42600萬後,內部人群遭受了最高的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd.

讓我們仔細看看,不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於史丹利農業集團有限公司的什麼。

big
SZSE:002588 Ownership Breakdown November 4th 2024
SZSE:002588 2024年11月4日的所有權細分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd?

機構所有權告訴我們史丹利農業集團有限公司的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

史丹利農業集團有限公司已經有機構在股東名冊上。的確,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查史丹利農業集團有限公司的過去收益軌跡(下圖)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SZSE:002588 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 4th 2024
SZSE:002588 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 4th 2024

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd. The company's largest shareholder is Wen Ban Gao, with ownership of 23%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 4.6% of the stock. Jin Hua Gao, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd. The company's largest shareholder is Wen Ban Gao, with ownership of 23%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 4.6% of the stock. Jin Hua Gao, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還發現,約51%的公司股份由前5大股東控制,表明這些所有者對公司業務具有重要影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd

Insider Ownership Of Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Stanley Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥4.8b stake in this CN¥8.3b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.

我們的信息顯示,內部人士擁有史丹利農業集團有限公司超過一半的股份。這使他們有效地控制着公司。這意味着內部人士在這家83億人民幣業務中持有着非常有意義的48億人民幣的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的信號,顯示與股東有很強的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在減少持股。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆,包括零售投資者,持有該公司34%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這樣的持有量不足以左右政策決策方向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Stanley Agriculture GroupLtd (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了史丹利農業集團Ltd的2個警告信號(其中1個與我們不太合適!),在投資這裏之前,您應該注意這些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論