Cashway Fintech Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:603106) Last Week's 17% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Cashway Fintech Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:603106) Last Week's 17% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要見解
- Cashway FintechLtd's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 58% ownership
- Insider ownership in Cashway FintechLtd is 13%
- 恒銀科技有限公司的重要私人公司所有權表明關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
- 2個投資者持有該公司的大部分股份,佔有58%的所有權。
- 恒銀科技有限公司的內部所有權爲13%
If you want to know who really controls Cashway Fintech Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:603106), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 46% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果想知道誰真正控制着Cashway Fintech Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:603106),那麼你需要查看其股東名單的構成。私人公司擁有46%的股份,是公司中持股最多的實體。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As market cap fell to CN¥5.7b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着市值上週下降至57億人民幣,私營公司可能面臨的損失將超過公司的任何其他股東群體。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cashway FintechLtd, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解恒銀科技有限公司每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cashway FintechLtd?
機構持股告訴我們有關恒銀科技有限公司的哪些信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Cashway FintechLtd. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
機構在恒銀科技有限公司中持有的股份非常少。這表明公司引起了一些基金的關注,但目前並不是專業投資者特別青睞的對象。 如果公司正在增長收益,這可能表明它才剛開始引起這些資金雄厚的投資者的注意。 我們有時會看到股價上漲,當少數幾家大型機構同時想要購買某隻股票時。您可以在下面看到收益和營業收入的歷史數據,有助於考慮更多機構投資者是否會想要這隻股票。當然,也有很多其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Cashway FintechLtd. Hengrong Investment Group Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 46% of shares outstanding. Hao Ran Jiang is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and CITIC Securities Company Limited, Asset Management Arm holds about 0.5% of the company stock.
對恒銀科技有限公司的股份基金持有不多。恒融投資集團有限公司目前是最大股東,持有46%的流通股。蔣豪然持有12%的普通股,位居第二大股東,中信證券(adr)資產管理部持有公司股份的約0.5%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究機構持股是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的一種好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現相同的目標。我們目前沒有注意到該股票的任何分析師報告,因此該公司不大可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Cashway FintechLtd
恒銀科技有限公司內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Cashway Fintech Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.7b, and insiders have CN¥719m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來內部人士擁有恒銀科技有限公司的相當大比例。其市值僅爲57億人民幣,內部人士擁有71900萬人民幣的股份。我們會說這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能是業務的創建者。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 37% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有公司37%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然掌控決策,但它肯定會對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 46%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有公司46%的股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份,而不是以個人的身份,對一家公共公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但這是值得進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Cashway FintechLtd you should know about.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。考慮風險,比如。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現恒銀科技有2個警告信號,您應該知道。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。