The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE:THG) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 88% of the Company
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE:THG) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 88% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Hanover Insurance Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構持有情況顯著高,這意味着漢諾威保險集團的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
Every investor in The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE:THG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 88% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (紐交所:THG)的投資者都應該了解最大股東群體。我們可以看到,機構持有該公司88%的股份。換句話說,該集團收益(或虧損)最大的可能性來自他們對該公司的投資。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hanover Insurance Group.
讓我們近距離觀察不同類型的股東,看看它們能爲我們提供漢諾威保險集團的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hanover Insurance Group?
機構所有權告訴我們有關漢諾威保險集團的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Hanover Insurance Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hanover Insurance Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
漢諾威保險集團已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們擁有公司中令人尊重的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售某支股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查漢諾威保險集團的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hanover Insurance Group. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.3% and 6.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到,對漢諾威保險集團,對沖基金沒有實質性投資。 同時,凡爾賽集團目前是最大的股東,持有已發行股份的9.9%。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的9.3%和6.8%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據的進一步研究表明,前13大股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Hanover Insurance Group
漢諾威保險集團的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$50m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義持有漢諾威保險集團股份不到1%。這是一家相當大的公司,董事會成員可能擁有公司中的重要利益,儘管持有比例不高。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約5000萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但值得檢查這些內部人是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Hanover Insurance Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有漢諾威保險集團的11%股份。雖然這個群體不能稱霸,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hanover Insurance Group better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解漢諾威保險集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。