With 62% Ownership in Erasca, Inc. (NASDAQ:ERAS), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 62% Ownership in Erasca, Inc. (NASDAQ:ERAS), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Erasca implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 11 shareholders own 53% of the company
- 12% of Erasca is held by insiders
- 機構在Erasca的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響
- 該公司前11名股東擁有公司的53%股份
- Erasca的12%股份由內部持有者持有
A look at the shareholders of Erasca, Inc. (NASDAQ:ERAS) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 62% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看Erasca, Inc. (NASDAQ:ERAS)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。持有最大股份的是擁有62%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲益最多(或如果市場走低則損失最多)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$65m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 21% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
公司上週市值增加了6500萬美元,機構投資者的前景看好。 股東的一年回報率目前爲21%,而上週的增長是錦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Erasca, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Erasca的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241105/0-6004b3a7d4a404fbbaf17b01bb3e2861-0-7afb36910cf1dd01f48f88aa7d44e4a3.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Erasca?
機構投資者對Erasca的持股情況告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Erasca already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Erasca's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Erasca已經有機構在股東名冊上。 實際上,他們在公司擁有一部分股權。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過股票,他們喜歡它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。 如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得看一看Erasca的以下收入歷史記錄。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241105/0-6004b3a7d4a404fbbaf17b01bb3e2861-1-7ba66853f725c5c3eda72fc99c90faf6.png/big)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Erasca. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jonathan Lim with 11% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are VR Adviser, LLC and Frazier Life Sciences Management, LP, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 5.7%.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會決策。我們注意到,對於Erasca來說,對沖基金並沒有意義重大的投資。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是首席執行官Jonathan Lim,持有11%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是VR Adviser,LLC和Frazier Life Sciences Management,LP,他們的股份比例相等,都爲5.7%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 53% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步調查,我們發現前11名股東在公司中擁有53%的綜合所有權,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Erasca
Erasca的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Erasca, Inc.. Insiders own US$92m worth of shares in the US$768m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根據我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有人擁有Erasca, Inc.相當比例的股份。內部持有人在這家市值76800萬美元的公司中擁有價值9200萬美元的股份。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部持有人可能是該業務的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部持有人是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Erasca. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Erasca持有14%的股份。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 11% stake in Erasca. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股權投資公司持有Erasca 11%的股份。這表明他們可能會對重要政策決策產生影響。一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲私人股權有時能夠鼓勵公司採取能夠讓市場看到該公司價值的策略。另外,這些持有者可能會在公司上市後退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Erasca better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Erasca (at least 3 which are a bit concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
始終值得考慮公司股權歸屬的不同群體。但要更好地了解Erasca,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,要考慮到投資風險的可能性。我們已經確認了Erasca存在4個警示信號(至少有3個有點引人擔憂),理解這些信號應該成爲你投資過程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。