Butterfly Network, Inc. (NYSE:BFLY) Surges 29%; Retail Investors Who Own 49% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
Butterfly Network, Inc. (NYSE:BFLY) Surges 29%; Retail Investors Who Own 49% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Butterfly Network by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 零售投資者對蝴蝶網絡擁有重要控制權,這意味着普通公衆在影響管理和治理決策方面擁有更大的權力
- 前25大股東擁有該公司47%的股份。
- 最近有內部人員購買。
If you want to know who really controls Butterfly Network, Inc. (NYSE:BFLY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 49% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制着蝴蝶網絡股份公司(NYSE:BFLY),那麼您需要查看其股權登記冊的構成。持有該公司最多股份的集團,大約佔公司股份的49%,就是零售投資者。換句話說,該群體在其對公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或失去最多)利益。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched US$434m last week, while institutions who own 25% also benefitted.
零售投資者上週市值達到43400萬美元后獲利最大,而擁有25%股份的機構也受益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Butterfly Network.
讓我們更仔細地看一看,看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Butterfly Network的什麼情況。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Butterfly Network?
機構所有權告訴我們有關Butterfly Network的什麼情況?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Butterfly Network already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Butterfly Network, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Butterfly Network已經有機構在股東名冊上。的確,他們在公司擁有一部分可觀的股份。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴於這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售股票,那通常會導致股價大幅下跌。因此值得檢查Butterfly Network過去的收益軌跡,(以下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Butterfly Network is not owned by hedge funds. Our data suggests that Jonathan Rothberg, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 17%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. With 5.0% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Fosun International Holdings Ltd. and Glenview Capital Management, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Joseph DeVivo directly holds 0.8% of the total shares outstanding.
蝴蝶網絡不是由對沖基金持有。我們的數據顯示,也是公司最高主要執行官的Jonathan Rothberg持有17%的股份。當內部人持有公司的大量股份時,投資者會將其視爲積極信號,因爲這表明內部人願意將自己的財富捆綁在公司的未來。 另外,分別持有5.0%和4.7%流通股的方大國際控股有限公司和Glenview Capital Management,LLC是第二和第三大股東。 此外,公司的CEO Joseph DeVivo直接持有流通股總數的0.8%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Butterfly Network
蝴蝶網絡的內部人持有情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Butterfly Network, Inc.. Insiders own US$92m worth of shares in the US$434m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在Butterfly Network, Inc.持有大量股份。內部人士擁有價值9200萬美元的股份,這家價值43400萬美元的公司。我們會說這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能創立了這家企業。您可以點擊此處查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 49% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Butterfly Network. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有49%股權的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在Butterfly Network中具有一定程度的影響力。雖然這個群體不能必然做出決策,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.0%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有公司股份的5.0%。 私人公司可能是相關方。 有時,內部人士通過持有私人公司的股份而不是作爲個人在公共公司中感興趣。 雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但 值得進一步研究。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Butterfly Network better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Butterfly Network has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
始終值得考慮各種持有公司股份的團體。 但要更好地了解Butterfly Network,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 以風險爲例 - Butterfly Network有3個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。