Retail Investors Who Hold 39% of Anhui Ronds Science & Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:688768) Gained 16%, Insiders Profited as Well
Retail Investors Who Hold 39% of Anhui Ronds Science & Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:688768) Gained 16%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Anhui Ronds Science & Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insider ownership in Anhui Ronds Science & Technology is 29%
- 零售投資者對安徽藍達科技的重要控制意味着普通大衆能夠更有力地影響管理和治理相關決策
- 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
- 安徽藍達科技的內部所有權爲29%
Every investor in Anhui Ronds Science & Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:688768) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 39% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
安徽藍達科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688768)的每位投資者都應該了解最有影響力的股東群體。我們可以看到,零售投資者擁有公司39%的所有權,換句話說,該群體面臨的上行潛力(或下行風險)最大。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥2.9b last week, while insiders who own 29% also benefitted.
上週市值達到29億元后,零售投資者獲得了最大收益,而持有29%股份的內部人員也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Anhui Ronds Science & Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究安徽融特科技的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Anhui Ronds Science & Technology?
機構持股情況告訴我們關於安徽融特科技的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Anhui Ronds Science & Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Anhui Ronds Science & Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到安徽融特科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們處於'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以查看安徽融特科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更爲複雜。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Anhui Ronds Science & Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Weihua Nie, with ownership of 19%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 9.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Weiyin Jia, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Vice Chairman.
我們注意到,對安徽任氏科技沒有意義的對沖基金投資。該公司最大的股東是聶衛華,持有19%的股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的12%和9.1%。同時持有第三大股東的賈維銀,也擔任副董事長。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以加深對股票預期表現的全面了解也是一個好習慣。雖然有部分分析師的覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有受到廣泛的關注。因此,在未來可能會受到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Anhui Ronds Science & Technology
安徽任氏科技內部股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Anhui Ronds Science & Technology Incorporated Company. Insiders own CN¥850m worth of shares in the CN¥2.9b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
似乎內部股東擁有安徽江濱科技股份有限公司的相當比例。 內部股東持有總市值爲85000萬人民幣的股份,在總市值29億人民幣的公司中。看到內部股東對業務如此投入令人振奮。也許值得查看這些內部股東最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司中擁有39%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但它肯定會對公司的運作產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司12%的股份。 僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下那些私營公司的所有者是誰。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有對一家公共公司股票的興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。