Individual Investors Are Shenzhen Farben Information Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300925) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.3b
Individual Investors Are Shenzhen Farben Information Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300925) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.3b
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
- 30% of Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd is held by insiders
- 深圳法本信息技術有限公司由個人投資者持有相當比例的股份,這表明他們在管理和業務策略上共同擁有更大的發言權。
- 前16名股東持有該業務50%的股份。
- 深圳法本信息技術有限公司30%的股份由內部人士持有。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shenzhen Farben Information Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300925), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着深圳法本信息技術有限公司(SZSE:300925)很重要,需要了解該企業的所有權結構。持有最大比例的是個人投資者,擁有47%的所有權。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 10% price drop, insiders with their 30% also suffered.
上週股價下跌10%後,個人投資者的持股受到了打擊,持股30%的內部人員也遭受了損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了深圳法本信息技術有限公司的不同所有權集團。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f9bf/9f9bf4557d8f4f72b90ff398cf1f501fccbe7034" alt="big"
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd?
機構所有權對我們如何看待深圳法本信息技術有限公司提供了哪些信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
深圳法本信息技術有限公司的股東名冊上已經有了一些機構。實際上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證持謹慎態度。他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,查看深圳法本信息技術有限公司的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0d9e/f0d9e3bcfb17f1e1a9c7789796aade6674d4489b" alt="big"
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Hua Yan with 25% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.0% and 2.5% of the stock.
對沖基金在深圳法本信息科技有限公司持有的股票不多。從我們的數據中可以看出,最大的股東是CEO華巖,持有25%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約6.0%和2.5%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
通過股東登記簿我們可以看到,16個最大的股東控制着50%的所有權,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd
深圳法本信息技術有限公司的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shenzhen Farben Information Technology Co.,Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥3.3b worth of shares in the CN¥11b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
內部股東擁有深圳法本信息科技有限公司的相當大比例。內部人士擁有價值33億人民幣的股份,佔該110億人民幣公司的相當大比例。這相當有意義。看到這種程度的投資是件好事。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 47% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆擁有47%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成,對深圳法本信息科技有限公司有一定程度的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 13%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有發行股票的13%。這值得更深入地研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人員,對其中一傢俬人公司有興趣,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司有戰略興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Shenzhen Farben Information TechnologyLtd (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有更重要的因素。例如,我們發現了深圳法本信息技術有限公司的2個警示標誌(1個有點令人擔憂!)在您在此處投資之前,您應該了解這些。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。