Here's Why AZZ (NYSE:AZZ) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
Here's Why AZZ (NYSE:AZZ) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies AZZ Inc. (NYSE:AZZ) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
傳奇基金經理李錄(得到查理·芒格支持)曾經說過,「最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性的資本損失。」 當你評估風險時,考慮一家公司的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲在一家企業倒閉時通常涉及到債務。 和許多其他公司一樣,AZZ Inc.(紐交所:AZZ)使用債務。 但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司變得風險較高。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當債務和其他負債無法用自由現金流或者以有吸引力的價格籌措到資本金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,將會成爲公司的風險。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以掌控公司。然而,一個更常見但仍然痛苦的情況是,公司必須以低價籌集新的資本金,從而永久性稀釋股東。通過代替稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率進行增長的企業的極好工具。當我們審查債務水平時,我們首先要考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is AZZ's Net Debt?
AZZ的淨債務是多少?
As you can see below, AZZ had US$913.3m of debt at August 2024, down from US$1.00b a year prior. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.
正如以下內容所示,AZZ在2024年8月有91330萬美元的債務,比上一年的10億美元減少。 淨債務大致相同,因爲它沒有太多現金。
A Look At AZZ's Liabilities
查看azz公司的負債情況
According to the last reported balance sheet, AZZ had liabilities of US$217.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.02b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$2.15m as well as receivables valued at US$269.9m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$968.5m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
根據最近披露的資產負債表,azz公司在12個月內到期的負債爲21710萬元美元,在12個月後到期的負債爲10.2億美元。 抵消這些義務,它持有215萬美元的現金以及價值26990萬元美元的應收賬款,12個月內到期。 因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出96850萬元美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since AZZ has a market capitalization of US$2.37b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
雖然這可能看起來很多,但並不算太糟,因爲azz公司的市值爲23.7億美元,所以如果需要的話,它可能通過增發資本來加強資產負債表。 但是,仍然值得密切關注其償還債務的能力。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們使用兩個主要比率來了解債務相對於收入的水平。首先是淨債務除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其稅前利潤(EBIT)可以覆蓋利息支出的倍數(或簡稱爲利息覆蓋率)。 這種方法的優勢在於我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨債務與EBITDA)又考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(利息覆蓋比)。
While AZZ's debt to EBITDA ratio (2.9) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 2.5, suggesting high leverage. It seems clear that the cost of borrowing money is negatively impacting returns for shareholders, of late. Fortunately, AZZ grew its EBIT by 6.5% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if AZZ can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
儘管azz公司的債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率爲2.9,表明它使用了一些債務,但其利息償付倍數非常弱,爲2.5,表明其槓桿率很高。 似乎很明顯,借款成本對股東的回報產生了負面影響。 幸運的是,azz公司在過去一年中將其EBIt增長了6.5%,相對於收入,其債務在逐漸減少。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。 但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定azz公司是否能夠隨着時間推移加強其資產負債表。 因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現分析師利潤預測的這份免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, AZZ's free cash flow amounted to 43% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,一家企業只能用現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。 因此,我們始終要檢查EBIt中有多少被轉化爲自由現金流。 在過去三年中,azz公司的自由現金流佔其EBIt的比例爲43%,低於預期。 這種薄弱的現金轉化率使其更難處理負債。
Our View
我們的觀點
AZZ's struggle to cover its interest expense with its EBIT had us second guessing its balance sheet strength, but the other data-points we considered were relatively redeeming. But on the bright side, its ability to to grow its EBIT isn't too shabby at all. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that AZZ is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for AZZ (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
azz inc通過EBIT無法支付利息開銷,讓我們開始懷疑其資產負債表的強度,但我們考慮的其他歷史數據點相對令人振奮。但好消息是,其增長EBIT的能力並不算太差,看起來AZZ作爲一項投資存在一定風險,這與其債務有關。這並不一定是壞事,因爲槓桿可以提高股本回報率,但這是需要注意的事項。在分析債務時,資產負債表明顯是需要關注的領域。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。例如,在投資AZZ之前,我們發現了3個警示信號(其中1個比較令人擔憂!),您在此投資前應該注意這些問題。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。