Arrow Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:AROW) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 14% Over Last Week
Arrow Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:AROW) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 14% Over Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Arrow Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 高機構所有權意味着Arrow Financial的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 前 25 名股東擁有公司 46% 的股份
- 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現
If you want to know who really controls Arrow Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:AROW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 49% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着艾睿金融公司(納斯達克股票代碼:AROW),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲49%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
Last week's 14% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 50% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週的漲幅爲14%,這意味着儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,股東的一年回報率爲50%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Arrow Financial, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Arrow Financial的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arrow Financial?
關於Arrow Financial,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
We can see that Arrow Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Arrow Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,Arrow Financial確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Arrow Financial的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Arrow Financial is not owned by hedge funds. North Country Investment Advisers, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.0% of the company stock.
Arrow Financial不歸對沖基金所有。North Country Investment Advisers, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有7.7%的普通股,Vanguard Group, Inc.持有該公司約5.0%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Arrow Financial
艾睿金融的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Arrow Financial Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$13m worth of the US$492m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有艾睿金融公司的部分股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值4.92億美元的公司的價值1300萬美元。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in Arrow Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Arrow Financial48%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。