Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Northeast Bank (NASDAQ:NBN) With 64% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Northeast Bank (NASDAQ:NBN) With 64% Ownership
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Northeast Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 52% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 高機構所有權意味着東北銀行的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 52% 的業務由前 11 名股東持有
- 內部人士最近一直在買入
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Northeast Bank (NASDAQ:NBN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 64% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制了東北銀行(納斯達克股票代碼:NBN),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲64%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Last week's 13% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 102% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週13%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,一年股東回報率爲102%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Northeast Bank, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究東北銀行的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Northeast Bank?
關於東北銀行,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
Northeast Bank already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Northeast Bank, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
東北銀行已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看東北銀行過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Northeast Bank is not owned by hedge funds. With a 8.5% stake, CEO Richard Wayne is the largest shareholder. With 8.4% and 6.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Richard Cohen and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Richard Cohen is also Chief Financial Officer, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。東北銀行不歸對沖基金所有。首席執行官理查德·韋恩持有8.5%的股份,是最大股東。理查德·科恩和貝萊德公司分別擁有8.4%和6.7%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。有趣的是,第二大股東理查德·科恩也是首席財務官,他再次指出,公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 52% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前11名股東擁有該公司的總所有權爲52%,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Northeast Bank
東北銀行的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Northeast Bank. Insiders have a US$167m stake in this US$754m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人士持有東北銀行的大量股份。業內人士在這項7.54億美元的業務中持有1.67億美元的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Northeast Bank. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有東北銀行14%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Northeast Bank that you should be aware of before investing here.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了東北銀行的一個警告信號,在這裏投資之前你應該注意這個信號。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。