MSA Safety (NYSE:MSA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
MSA Safety (NYSE:MSA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
傳奇基金經理李錄(得到查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:「最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性的資本損失。」 因此,當你考慮任何特定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。 我們注意到msa safety公司(紐交所: msa)的資產負債表上確實有債務。 但這筆債務是否會讓股東擔憂呢?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什麼時候負債才是一個問題?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
當一家企業無法通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行債務時,債務和其他負債就成爲風險。 資本主義的一個重要特徵是「創造性破壞」過程,即失敗的企業會被銀行無情清算。 雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到有債務的公司因爲債權人強迫其以壓力價格籌集資金而導致股東永久性攤薄。 當然,許多公司利用債務來實現增長,沒有產生任何負面後果。 在考慮企業使用多少債務時,首要之處是將現金和債務一起看待。
What Is MSA Safety's Debt?
msa safety的債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that MSA Safety had US$554.7m of debt in September 2024, down from US$742.0m, one year before. However, it also had US$154.4m in cash, and so its net debt is US$400.4m.
您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數據,但顯示msa safety在2024年9月有55470萬美元的債務,低於之前一年的74200萬美元。 然而,它也有15440萬美元的現金,因此淨債務爲40040萬美元。
A Look At MSA Safety's Liabilities
msa safety負債情況一覽
According to the last reported balance sheet, MSA Safety had liabilities of US$314.5m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$832.1m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$154.4m in cash and US$277.3m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$714.9m.
根據最近披露的資產負債表,MSA Safety的負債中有31450萬元美元在12個月內到期,而超過12個月到期的負債爲83210萬元美元。與此相抵,該公司的現金爲15440萬元美元,應收賬款爲27730萬元美元,在12個月內到期。因此,其負債超過現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和達到71490萬元美元。
Since publicly traded MSA Safety shares are worth a total of US$6.60b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由於公開交易的 msa safety 股票總值爲66億美元,因此似乎不太可能這種水平的負債構成重大威脅。但有足夠的負債,我們當然會建議股東繼續密切關注資產負債表的變化。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
MSA Safety's net debt is only 0.84 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 13.4 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Fortunately, MSA Safety grew its EBIT by 7.6% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine MSA Safety's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
MSA Safety的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的0.84倍。而其EBIT輕鬆覆蓋其利息支出,是13.4倍之多。因此,我們對其超保守地使用債務感到放心。幸運的是,MSA Safety 在去年的EBIT上增長了7.6%,使得負債負擔看起來更加可控。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終能否保持健康資產負債表更多地取決於未來的收入,這才是決定 MSA Safety 能否保持健康財務狀況的關鍵。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, MSA Safety's free cash flow amounted to 34% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
但我們最終的考慮也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤償付債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,我們始終檢查多少EBIT被轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,MSA Safety 的自由現金流相當於其EBIT的34%,低於我們的預期。這種較弱的現金轉化率使得處理債務更加困難。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, MSA Safety's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that MSA Safety can handle its debt fairly comfortably. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. We'd be motivated to research the stock further if we found out that MSA Safety insiders have bought shares recently. If you would too, then you're in luck, since today we're sharing our list of reported insider transactions for free.
值得高興的是,MSA Safety令人印象深刻的利息償付能力意味着它在債務方面具有優勢。但是,更令人擔憂的是,我們對其將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的情況有些擔憂。 綜合考慮所有上述因素,我們認爲MSA Safety可以相當舒適地處理其債務。當然,雖然這種槓桿可以增加股本回報率,但也帶來更多風險,因此值得關注。如果發現MSA Safety內部人士最近購買了股票,我們會更有動力進一步研究這隻股票。如果你也是這樣,那麼你很幸運,因爲今天我們將免費分享我們的報告的內部交易列表。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。