share_log

Institutional Investors Are Old Second Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OSBC) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$67m Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Old Second Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OSBC) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$67m Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (納斯達克:OSBC) 上週市值增加6700萬美元后最大的賭徒,並獲得獎勵。
Simply Wall St ·  11/07 21:08

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Old Second Bancorp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 22 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 考慮到機構在股票中擁有的大量股權,Old Second Bancorp的股價可能會受到他們交易決定的影響
  • 這家公司的前22大股東擁有其50%的股份。
  • 最近有內部人員購買。

A look at the shareholders of Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:OSBC) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 66% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (納斯達克: OSBC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。持有最大股份的是擁有66%所有權的機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 8.8% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 35%.

結果,公司股價上週上漲8.8%,使機構投資者獲得最豐厚的回報。 上週的收益將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前達到35%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Old Second Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解每種類型的old second bancorp所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:OSBC Ownership Breakdown November 7th 2024
NasdaqGS:OSBC所有權拆分於2024年11月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Old Second Bancorp?

機構所有權告訴我們有關Old Second Bancorp的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Old Second Bancorp. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Old Second Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在old second bancorp擁有相當大比例的股份。 這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅憑這一事實就依賴,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。 當多個機構持有某股票時,存在它們正在進行的'擁擠交易'的風險。 當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。 這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。 您可以在下面查看old second bancorp的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲複雜的。

big
NasdaqGS:OSBC Earnings and Revenue Growth November 7th 2024
納斯達克GS:old second bancorp第四季度2024年盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Old Second Bancorp. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.7% of shares outstanding. With 5.2% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and 1st & Main Growth Partners are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that James Eccher, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數已發行股份,董事會可能會注意他們的偏好。我們注意到對old second bancorp來說,對沖基金沒有實質性投資。截至目前,BlackRock,Inc. 是該公司最大的股東,持有7.7%的股份。分別持有5.2%和4.4%的已發行股份,The Vanguard Group,Inc.和1st & Main Growth Partners分別是第二和第三大股東。此外,我們發現首席執行官詹姆斯·埃切爾名下有0.7%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 22 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記表看,前22名股東控制着50%的股權,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有絕對控股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Old Second Bancorp

old second bancorp內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Old Second Bancorp, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$27m worth of stock in the US$748m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股東可能會感興趣地知道內部人士在old second bancorp,inc.擁有股份。在其自身名下,內部人士擁有價值2700萬美元的股票,在這家價值74800萬美元的公司中擁有股份。看到內部人士有一些投資是件好事,但值得注意的是,這些內部人士有沒有在買入股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司持有30%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽略。雖然擁有這種所有權的規模可能不足以使決策在他們的利益中而翻轉,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Old Second Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Old Second Bancorp has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

始終值得考慮公司的不同股東群體。 但要更好地了解old second bancorp,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 以風險爲例-old second bancorp有1個警告標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論