share_log

Capital City Bank Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CCBG) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week

Capital City Bank Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CCBG) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week

Capital City Bank集團,Inc.的(納斯達克:CCBG)大型機構持有者必定感到高興,因爲股票繼續表現出色,過去一週上漲12%
Simply Wall St ·  11/07 07:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Capital City Bank Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考慮到機構在股票中持有的大部分股份,capital city bank group的股價可能受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 前12個股東持有業務的51%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:CCBG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Capital City Bank Group,Inc. (納斯達克:CCBG),那麼您需要查看其股東登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司45%的所有權。換句話說,該集團將獲得(或損失)最多的投資回報。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$70m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 39%.

機構投資者在公司上週市值增加了7,000萬美元后,前景看好。上週的收益將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前爲39%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Capital City Bank Group.

讓我們更仔細地看一下不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關capital city bank group的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:CCBG Ownership Breakdown November 7th 2024
NasdaqGS:CCBG 2024年11月7日的股權拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Capital City Bank Group?

機構持股告訴我們有關capital city bank group的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Capital City Bank Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Capital City Bank Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Capital City Bank Group在股東名冊上已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人都會犯錯一樣。如果兩位大型機構投資者嘗試同時出售股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Capital City Bank Group的過去收益軌跡(如下圖所示)。當然,也要注意還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:CCBG Earnings and Revenue Growth November 7th 2024
納斯達克納斯達克市值: capital city bank group 盈利和營業收入增長2024年11月7日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Capital City Bank Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO William Smith with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 5.1% of the stock.

對沖基金在 capital city bank group 持有的股份並不多。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是CEO 威廉·史密斯,持有17% 的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約11% 和5.1% 的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

考慮到前12名股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Capital City Bank Group

capital city bank group 內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Capital City Bank Group, Inc.. Insiders have a US$118m stake in this US$605m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息顯示,內部人士在capital city bank group保持着重要的持股。內部人士在這家市值60500萬美元的公司中持有11800萬美元的股份。看到內部人員如此投資於業務是件好事。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 35% stake in Capital City Bank Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在capital city bank group中持有35%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右政策決定的走向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Capital City Bank Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those can't be ignored...

在考慮擁有公司的不同群體時是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,capital city bank group在我們的投資分析中顯示出2個警告信號,其中1個不能忽視...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論