Institutional Investors Control 53% of Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 13%
Institutional Investors Control 53% of Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 13%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Hingham Institution for Savings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 52% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 機構在欣厄姆銀行持有大量股份,這意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響
- 13位最大股東持有公司52%的股份
- 內部人員最近一直在買入。
If you want to know who really controls Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制着欣厄姆銀行(NASDAQ:HIFS),那麼您必須查看其股權登記簿組成。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司53%的股權。換句話說,這個團體最有可能(或最有可能)從他們投資公司中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
Last week's 13% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 84% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週的漲幅達到了13%,這意味着機構投資者處於正面光譜的一端,即使公司展現出強勁的長期趨勢。股東的一年回報率目前爲84%,上週的漲幅則錦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hingham Institution for Savings.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關欣厄姆銀行的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hingham Institution for Savings?
機構持股告訴我們有關欣厄姆銀行的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Hingham Institution for Savings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hingham Institution for Savings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,欣厄姆銀行的確有機構投資者;他們持有公司的一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,且他們對其很看好。但與其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時賣出股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。所以值得查看欣厄姆銀行的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要牢記還有其他因素要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hingham Institution for Savings. Maren Capital LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.2% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Robert Gaughen is the owner of 2.4% of the company's shares.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對於欣厄姆銀行,對沖基金並沒有持有太多股份。 Maren Capital LLC目前是該公司最大的股東,持有7.2%的股份。具體來說,第二大股東持有約6.1%的股份,緊隨其後的是第三大股東持有5.9%的股份。此外,首席執行官Robert Gaughen擁有公司股份的2.4%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊來看,前13名股東控制着52%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Hingham Institution for Savings
欣厄姆銀行內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hingham Institution for Savings. Insiders own US$84m worth of shares in the US$567m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
根據我們最近的數據,內部持有者擁有欣厄姆銀行相當比例的股份。內部持有者在這家市值56700萬美元的公司中擁有8400萬美元的股份。看到內部持有者如此投入業務是很好的。也許值得檢查這些內部持有者最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Hingham Institution for Savings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在欣厄姆銀行持有23%的股份。雖然這種持股比例相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 10%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私營企業持有該公司股份的10%。 單憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得查明是誰擁有那些私營企業。 有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過另一個私營公司持有公共公司股份的利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Hingham Institution for Savings .
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了更深入了解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意我們在欣厄姆銀行中發現的1個預警信號。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。