share_log

A Great Week for Institutional Investors Who Own 52% of Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS)

A Great Week for Institutional Investors Who Own 52% of Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS)

機構投資者擁有Worthington Steel, Inc.(紐交所:WS)52%的股份,這是一個偉大的一週。
Simply Wall St ·  11/07 14:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Worthington Steel's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 4 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders own 31% of Worthington Steel
  • 機構持有大量股份意味着沃辛頓鋼鐵的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前4個股東擁有公司的51%股權。
  • 內部人持有沃辛頓鋼鐵31%的股份。

Every investor in Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

沃辛頓鋼鐵公司(NYSE:WS)的每位投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。擁有公司股份數量最多的群體,確切地說約佔52%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, institutional investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 15% gain.

作爲結果,機構投資者是上週15%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Worthington Steel.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Worthington Steel的什麼信息。

big
NYSE:WS Ownership Breakdown November 7th 2024
紐交所:WS所有權結構分析2024年11月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Worthington Steel?

機構持股告訴我們關於Worthington Steel的什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Worthington Steel does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Worthington Steel's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Worthington Steel確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司的大部分股票。這可能意味着公司在投資社區有一定的信譽度。然而,最好對依靠機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Worthington Steel下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:WS Earnings and Revenue Growth November 7th 2024
紐交所:WS盈利和營業收入增長2024年11月7日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Worthington Steel is not owned by hedge funds. John McConnell is currently the company's largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. With 9.7% and 8.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Geoffrey Gilmore is the owner of 0.5% of the company's shares.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同發揮重大的影響力。Worthington Steel不被對沖基金持有。約翰·麥康納爾目前是公司最大的股東,持有29%的股份。此外,分別持有公司9.7%和8.0%的股份,BlackRock, Inc.和The Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二和第三大股東。此外,首席執行官傑弗裏·吉爾摩擁有公司0.5%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。

Insider Ownership Of Worthington Steel

Worthington Steel的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Worthington Steel, Inc.. Insiders own US$610m worth of shares in the US$2.0b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員擁有Worthington Steel, Inc.相當比例的股份。內部人員在這家價值20億美元的公司中擁有61000萬美元的股份。這是相當有意義的。看到這種投資水平是好事。您可以在這裏查看,看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有公司17%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這種擁有量相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Worthington Steel better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。 但要更好地了解Worthington Steel,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論