An Excellent Week for Chinasoft International Limited's (HKG:354) Institutional Owners Who Own 46% as One-year Returns Inch Higher
An Excellent Week for Chinasoft International Limited's (HKG:354) Institutional Owners Who Own 46% as One-year Returns Inch Higher
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Chinasoft International's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 53% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 考慮到機構在該股票中持有的大部分股份,中軟國際的股價可能會受到他們的交易決定的影響
- 前7大股東持有該業務的53%股份
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Chinasoft International Limited (HKG:354), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 46% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着中軟國際有限公司(HKG:354),重要的是理解該業務的所有權結構。 機構持有46%股份,是公司中擁有最多股份的機構。 換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 12% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 8.6% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
結果,上週公司股價上漲12%,機構投資者獲得了最豐厚的回報。 股東的一年回報率目前爲8.6%,而上週的漲幅更是錦上添花。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Chinasoft International.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Chinasoft International不同的所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chinasoft International?
機構所有權告訴我們有關Chinasoft International的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Chinasoft International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Chinasoft International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到Chinasoft International確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的一大部分。 這可能表明公司在投資界有一定的信譽度。 然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。 他們有時也會犯錯。 當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們可能處於"擁擠交易"的風險。 當這樣的交易失敗時,多個交易方可能會競相快速賣出股票。 在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這一風險會更高。 您可以在下面看到Chinasoft International的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事總是複雜的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chinasoft International. Dan Capital Management Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Yuhong Chen, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
我們注意到對華軟國際的投資意義上未見對沖基金的投資。丹資本管理有限公司目前是公司最大的股東,持有14%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有10%和9.2%的流通股份。第三大股東陳玉紅也是公司董事會主席。
We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前7名股東擁有超過一半的股份登記冊,還有一些小股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Chinasoft International
華軟國際的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in Chinasoft International Limited. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around HK$1.6b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到,內部持有股份的是中國軟件國際有限公司。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在有意義的一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們持有價值大約16億港元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士在這個投資水平上是很好的。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Chinasoft International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有30%股權的是普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在中國軟件國際有一定的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東的意見不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Chinasoft International. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股權投資公司持有中國軟件國際14%的股份。 這意味着他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。 一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時能夠鼓勵幫助市場看到公司價值的策略。 或者,這些持有者可能在將其公開後退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Chinasoft International is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我覺得查看公司確切所有者非常有趣。 但爲了真正深入了解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。 請注意,中國軟件國際在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警示信號,您應該了解...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。