Institutions Profited After Bank First Corporation's (NASDAQ:BFC) Market Cap Rose US$126m Last Week but Retail Investors Profited the Most
Institutions Profited After Bank First Corporation's (NASDAQ:BFC) Market Cap Rose US$126m Last Week but Retail Investors Profited the Most
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Bank First indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 35% of the company
- Insiders own 10% of Bank First
- 零售投資者大量持有銀行第一股份,表明他們共同在管理和業務策略上擁有更大的發言權
- 前25大股東擁有公司的35%。
- 內部持有銀行第一10%的股份
Every investor in Bank First Corporation (NASDAQ:BFC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
銀行第一公司(納斯達克:BFC)的每位投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的群體,準確地說佔公司股份約60%的人是零售投資者。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched US$1.0b last week, while institutions who own 30% also benefitted.
上週市值觸及10億美元后,散戶獲利最多,而持有30%的機構投資者也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Bank First, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究每種銀行第一的股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bank First?
機構持股告訴我們關於銀行第一的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Bank First does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Bank First, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到銀行第一確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的一大部分。這可能表明公司在投資社區具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者伴隨而來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一支股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此值得檢查銀行第一的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Bank First is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 7.0%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Michael Molepske, the CEO has 1.2% of the shares allocated to their name.
bank first不是對沖基金持有。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock,持有7.0%的股份。爲了更好理解,第二大股東持有約5.8%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.1%的股份。另外,我們發現CEO Michael Molepske名下擁有1.2%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。
Insider Ownership Of Bank First
bank first的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Bank First Corporation. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$103m stake in this US$1.0b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在Bank First Corporation中持有大量股份。看到內部人士在這家價值10億美元的企業中持有有意義的10300萬美元股份非常有趣。看到這種投資水平是很好的。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人士最近是不是一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 60% stake in Bank First, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
一般公衆(通常是個人投資者)在Bank First中持有相當大比例的60%股份,這表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。擁有這麼多股權,零售投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策中發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以行使表決權,對不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併行爲進行投票。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Bank First , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,投資風險始終懸在頭頂。我們已經發現了與bank first 相關的1個警告標誌,了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。