Barnes & Noble Education, Inc.'s (NYSE:BNED) Market Cap Surged US$94m Last Week, Public Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Barnes & Noble Education, Inc.'s (NYSE:BNED) Market Cap Surged US$94m Last Week, Public Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Barnes & Noble Education indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 56% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 公共公司在Barnes & Noble Education中的重要持股表明,他們共同在管理和業務戰略方面有更大的發言權
- 前三大股東持有該業務的56%股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
A look at the shareholders of Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (NYSE:BNED) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 42% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一下Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (NYSE:BNED)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。 公共公司擁有42%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。 也就是說,如果股票上漲,他們將獲得最大利益(或者如果市場出現下滑,將承擔最大損失)。
As a result, public companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 39% gain.
因此,上市公司成爲上週39%漲幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Barnes & Noble Education.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Barnes&Noble Education的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Barnes & Noble Education?
機構持有情況告訴我們有關Barnes&Noble Education的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Barnes & Noble Education does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Barnes & Noble Education, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Barnes&Noble Education確實有機構投資者; 他們持有公司股票的相當大比例。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽度。 但是我們不能僅憑這個事實而依賴,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人都會一樣。 如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,那麼看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。 因此,值得檢查Barnes&Noble Education的過去盈利軌跡(下文)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
It would appear that 7.9% of Barnes & Noble Education shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Immersion Corporation, with ownership of 42%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.9% and 6.0% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Jonathan Shar directly holds 1.4% of the total shares outstanding.
巴諾斯與貴族教育股份的7.9%由對沖基金控制。這一點值得注意,因爲對沖基金往往是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內創造價值(以及更高的股價)。該公司最大的股東是沉浸公司,持有42%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約7.9%和6.0%的股份。此外,該公司的首席執行官喬納森·莎爾直接持有總股本的1.4%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。分析師觀點也可以達到相同的目的。我們的信息表明,這隻股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,所以它可能不是很出名。
Insider Ownership Of Barnes & Noble Education
Barnes & Noble Education的內部人士持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Barnes & Noble Education, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$11m worth of stock in the US$331m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告,在Barnes & Noble Education, Inc.內部人員擁有股份。在他們自己的名義下,內部人員在這家價值33100萬美元的公司中擁有1100萬美元的股票。有人會說這顯示了股東和董事會利益的一致性。但也值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in Barnes & Noble Education. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Barnes & Noble Education持有38%的股份。儘管這個群體不能直接決定事務,但確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 42% of the Barnes & Noble Education shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
可以看到,上市公司持有巴恩斯&貴族教育股份總數的42%。很難確定,但這表明它們存在着糾纏在一起的業務利益。這可能是一種戰略性持股,因此值得關注這一領域的所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Barnes & Noble Education (at least 2 which are a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如,不斷存在的投資風險。我們已經發現了與巴恩斯&貴族教育有關的3個警告信號(至少有2個有點令人不快),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。