Institutional Investors Are Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.'s (NYSE:AHH) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$50m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.'s (NYSE:AHH) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$50m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Armada Hoffler Properties' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 高機構所有權意味着Armada Hoffler Properties的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 前13名股東擁有公司50%的股份
- 內部人士最近的購買
A look at the shareholders of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (NYSE:AHH) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 74% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:AHH)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲74%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.1b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 17% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週,在該公司的市值達到11億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。目前,一年股東回報率爲17%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Armada Hoffler Properties.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Armada Hoffler Properties的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Armada Hoffler Properties?
關於艦隊霍夫勒地產,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
Armada Hoffler Properties already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Armada Hoffler Properties' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Armada Hoffler Properties已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Armada Hoffler Properties的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Armada Hoffler Properties. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.6% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Louis Haddad, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.
由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Armada Hoffler Properties進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,已發行股份的16%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約9.6%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有4.6%的所有權。此外,我們發現首席執行官路易斯·哈達德以其名義分配了0.7%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前13名股東的總所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有一些分析師對這隻股票的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Armada Hoffler Properties
Armada Hoffler 地產的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$23m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2300萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in Armada Hoffler Properties. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有阿瑪達·霍夫勒地產24%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Armada Hoffler Properties better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Armada Hoffler Properties (including 1 which can't be ignored) .
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Armada Hoffler Properties,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該了解我們在Armada Hoffler Properties中發現的3個警告信號(包括一個不容忽視的警告)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。