Following a 15% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Ready Capital Corporation (NYSE:RC) Institutional Owners
Following a 15% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Ready Capital Corporation (NYSE:RC) Institutional Owners
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Ready Capital implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構對Ready Capital的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
- 前 25 名股東擁有公司 47% 的股份
- 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ready Capital Corporation (NYSE:RC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制了Ready Capital Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:RC),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲58%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Institutional investors would appreciate the 8.3% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 15%.
機構投資者將對上週股價上漲8.3%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的虧損總額達到令人失望的15%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ready Capital, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Ready Capital的每種類型的所有者。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241110/0-70ec623c9be5d5ce57166361e3298a17-0-e4bca38dbc40c639e601ca1aa10c11ae.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ready Capital?
關於Ready Capital,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ready Capital. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ready Capital, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所見,機構投資者在Ready Capital中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Ready Capital過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241110/0-70ec623c9be5d5ce57166361e3298a17-1-27ed61e101c174782067acf741ac7c88.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ready Capital. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 3.6% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在Ready Capital中的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,已發行股份的16%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有6.4%的普通股,道富環球顧問公司持有該公司約3.6%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Ready Capital
Ready Capital的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our information suggests that Ready Capital Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$12m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息表明,Ready Capital Corporation內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1200萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司40%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Ready Capital you should be aware of.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了兩個你應該注意的Ready Capital警告信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。