Foot Locker (NYSE:FL) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
Foot Locker (NYSE:FL) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
What financial metrics can indicate to us that a company is maturing or even in decline? More often than not, we'll see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining amount of capital employed. Ultimately this means that the company is earning less per dollar invested and on top of that, it's shrinking its base of capital employed. On that note, looking into Foot Locker (NYSE:FL), we weren't too upbeat about how things were going.
哪些財務指標可以表明一家公司正在成熟甚至走下坡路?通常情況下,我們會看到資本僱用回報率(ROCE)和資本僱用量逐漸下降。最終意味着公司從每投資一美元中賺取的利潤越來越少,並且它還在縮減其資本僱用基礎。在這一點上,看看富樂客(紐交所:FL),我們對事態的發展並不樂觀。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Foot Locker:
如果您之前沒有使用過ROCE,它衡量公司從業務中使用的資本所產生的「回報」(稅前利潤)。分析師使用這個公式來爲富樂客計算:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.025 = US$137m ÷ (US$7.0b - US$1.4b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to August 2024).
0.025 = 13700萬美元 ÷ (70億美元 - 14億美元)(基於2024年8月至2024年8月的滾動十二個月)。
So, Foot Locker has an ROCE of 2.5%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Specialty Retail industry average of 12%.
因此,富樂客的ROCE爲2.5%。最終,這是一個較低的回報率,低於專業零售行業的平均回報率12%。

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Foot Locker compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Foot Locker for free.
在上面,您可以看到富樂客當前的ROCE與其先前資本回報率相比,但過去的數據能告訴您的信息有限。如果您願意,您可以免費查看分析師對富樂客的預測。
What Does the ROCE Trend For Foot Locker Tell Us?
富樂客的ROCE趨勢告訴我們什麼?
In terms of Foot Locker's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. To be more specific, the ROCE was 13% five years ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. Meanwhile, capital employed in the business has stayed roughly the flat over the period. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Foot Locker becoming one if things continue as they have.
就富樂客歷史ROCE數據的變化而言,這一趨勢並不令人信心滿滿。具體來說,五年前的ROCE爲13%,但自那時以來明顯下降。與此同時,企業中的資本投入在這段時間內基本保持不變。這種組合可能表明這是一個成熟的企業,仍有領域可以投資,但由於新競爭或較小的利潤率,收益並不高。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於創造高收益,如果事態繼續發展,我們認爲富樂客不太可能成爲一個投資賺錢的機會。
Our Take On Foot Locker's ROCE
我們對富樂客的ROCE看法
In summary, it's unfortunate that Foot Locker is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 37% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.
總的來說,遺憾的是,富樂客在資本相同的情況下產生了較低的回報率。在過去的五年中,股價下跌了37%,因此投資者已經意識到這些變化。除非這些指標出現更積極的變化趨勢,我們會尋找其他投資機會。
Foot Locker could be trading at an attractive price in other respects, so you might find our free intrinsic value estimation for FL on our platform quite valuable.
從其他角度看,富樂客可能以有吸引力的價格交易,因此您可能會發現我們平台上針對FL的免費內在價值估算非常有價值。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想尋找財務狀況良好、回報卓越的實力強企業,可以免費查看以下公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。