share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU) With 81% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU) With 81% Ownership

機構投資者對DocuSign, Inc.(納斯達克: DOCU)持有81%的股權,押注相當大。
Simply Wall St ·  11/10 09:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in DocuSign implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構在DocuSign的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
  • 23位最大股東持有General Mills公司50%的業務。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。機構擁有81%的股份,在公司中佔有最多的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最大(或者如果有下降,將損失最多)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 12% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 94% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

作爲結果,公司股價上週上漲12%,機構投資者獲得了最大的回報。股東的一年回報率目前達到94%,上週的漲幅就像錦上添花一般。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DocuSign, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究一下docusign每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:DOCU Ownership Breakdown November 10th 2024
納斯達克:DOCU所有權分佈2024年11月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DocuSign?

機構持股比例對DocuSign有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that DocuSign does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at DocuSign's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,docusign確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當部分。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們對其評價很高。但就像其他投資者一樣,他們也可能犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下docusign的下方盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:DOCU Earnings and Revenue Growth November 10th 2024
納斯達克納斯達克公司:docusign盈利和營業收入增長 2024年11月10日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in DocuSign. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.2% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 2.6% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會共同影響董事會決定。對於docusign,對沖基金沒有持有很多股份。目前,Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股東,持有11%的股份。BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股東,擁有7.2%的普通股,State Street全球顧問公司持有公司股份的約2.6%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 23 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更詳細的所有權數據顯示,前23大股東共擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東佔多數。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of DocuSign

DocuSign的內部股東

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that DocuSign, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$160m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,docusign公司內部人士擁有公司不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部人員擁有大量股票。 他們總共擁有16000萬美元的股票。 在這種情況下,看看這些內部人員是在買入還是賣出可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DocuSign. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

由於佔有18%的股份,一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對docusign有一定的影響力。 雖然這一持股比例可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不協調,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - DocuSign has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,風險 - docusign有1個警示信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論