share_log

Private Companies Are EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688165) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥981m Last Week

Private Companies Are EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688165) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥981m Last Week

私營公司是宜安智能裝備股份有限公司(SHSE:688165)最大的股東,在上週市值上漲了人民幣98100萬後受到獎勵
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/11 10:32

Key Insights

主要見解

  • EFORT Intelligent Equipment's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 59% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 長風智能裝備的股東中有許多私營公司,這表明關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 共有5家投資者持有公司59%的控股權。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688165), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着長風智能裝備股份有限公司(SHSE:688165),了解企業的所有權結構至關重要。擁有公司股份最多的集團,準確地說是39%,是私營公司。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥5.8b market cap following a 20% gain in the stock.

結果,私營公司上週共計獲得了最高分,該公司股價上漲20%,市值達到人民幣58億。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of EFORT Intelligent Equipment.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注EFORt智能設備的不同所有權群體。

big
SHSE:688165 Ownership Breakdown November 11th 2024
SHSE:688165所有權拆分於2024年11月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EFORT Intelligent Equipment?

機構持股告訴我們關於EFORt智能設備的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in EFORT Intelligent Equipment. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see EFORT Intelligent Equipment's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所見,機構投資者在EFORt智能設備擁有相當數量的股權。這意味着代表這些機構的分析師已經研究了這支股票,並且他們看好它。但就像任何人一樣,他們也可能錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們處於'擁擠交易'的風險。 當這樣的交易失敗時,多個方參與者可能爭相迅速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以在下方看到EFORt智能設備的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。

big
SHSE:688165 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 11th 2024
SHSE:688165 營收和營業收入增長 2024年11月11日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in EFORT Intelligent Equipment. The company's largest shareholder is Wuhu Yuanhong Industrial Robot Investment Co., Ltd., with ownership of 16%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 11% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對於億福人智的投資不是對沖基金的一個重要投資。 公司最大的股東是蕪湖源鴻工業機器人投資有限公司,持有16%的股份。 第二大股東持有約13%的流通股份,第三大股東持有11%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 59% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示出公司大約59%的股份是由前5大股東控制的,這表明這些股東對業務有着重要影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況

Insider Ownership Of EFORT Intelligent Equipment

億福人智的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It appears that the board holds about CN¥31m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of CN¥5.8b. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示,益福智能裝備股份有限公司的內部持有人擁有不到1%的股份。 但他們可能通過我們沒有察覺到的公司結構間接持有利益。 從表面上看,董事會持有價值約3100萬人民幣的股票。與人民幣58億的市值相比,我們通常希望看到董事會更有投資。然而,值得檢查一下這些內部持有人是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in EFORT Intelligent Equipment. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有益福智能裝備24%的股份。 雖然這個集團不一定能決定事情,但肯定會在公司的運行中產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 24% stake in EFORT Intelligent Equipment. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

股權投資公司持有EFORt智能設備24%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。有時,我們會看到股權投資公司長揸股份,但一般來說,他們的投資期限較短,並且像名字所暗示的那樣,不太投資於上市公司。一段時間後,他們可能會尋找機會出售並將資金重新投資到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 39%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司39%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員通過對私人公司的持有,而不是以個人的身份,對一家上市公司表現出興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是一個進一步研究的領域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 4.6% of EFORT Intelligent Equipment stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

公共公司目前擁有EFORt智能設備股票的4.6%。這可能是戰略利益,這兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。可能是它們已經進行了分拆。這種持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand EFORT Intelligent Equipment better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解EFORt智能設備,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論