With 82% Ownership in Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 82% Ownership in Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Kratos Defense & Security Solutions' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 高機構所有權意味着Kratos Defense & Security Solutions的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 51% 的業務由前 16 名股東持有
- 內部人士最近一直在買入
Every investor in Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
克拉託斯國防與安全解決方案公司(納斯達克股票代碼:KTOS)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲82%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$3.9b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 49% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週,在該公司的市值達到39億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。目前,一年股東回報率爲49%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Kratos國防與安全解決方案的每種所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kratos Defense & Security Solutions?
關於Kratos國防與安全解決方案,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
We can see that Kratos Defense & Security Solutions does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Kratos Defense & Security Solutions' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,Kratos國防與安全解決方案確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Kratos國防與安全解決方案的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.2% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 3.9% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Eric DeMarco, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。Kratos 國防與安全解決方案不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲9.2%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有8.5%的普通股,道富環球顧問公司持有該公司約3.9%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官埃裏克·德馬科以其名義分配了0.7%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記處,我們可以看到,51%的所有權由前16名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
Kratos 國防與安全解決方案的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
We can see that insiders own shares in Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$87m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有Kratos國防與安全解決方案公司的股份。內部人士持有價值8700萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Kratos國防與安全解決方案15%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Kratos Defense & Security Solutions .
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解Kratos國防與安全解決方案,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意我們在Kratos國防與安全解決方案中發現的1個警告信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。