Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Shenzhen VMAX New Energy Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688612) Touches CN¥12b Market Cap
Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as Shenzhen VMAX New Energy Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688612) Touches CN¥12b Market Cap
Key Insights
主要見解
- Shenzhen VMAX New Energy's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Institutions own 15% of Shenzhen VMAX New Energy
- 深圳VMAX新能母基的重要內部股東表明對公司拓展存在固有利益
- 前6名股東持有公司51%的股份。
- 機構擁有深圳VMAX新能母基的15%
A look at the shareholders of Shenzhen VMAX New Energy Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688612) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 39% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
通過查看深圳VMAX新能母基有限公司(SHSE:688612)的股東,我們可以了解哪個群體最強大。個人內部人士持有39%的股份,公司中擁有最大股份。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上升空間(或下行風險)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥1.1b last week.
顯然,在上週公司市值增加了11億人民幣後,內部人員獲益最多。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shenzhen VMAX New Energy.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關深圳新能母基的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen VMAX New Energy?
機構持有情況告訴我們關於深圳新能母基的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shenzhen VMAX New Energy. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shenzhen VMAX New Energy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在深圳新能母基擁有相當大的股份。 這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。 如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得看看深圳新能母基以下的營業收入歷史。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Shenzhen VMAX New Energy is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Renchun Wan with 19% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Shenzhen Beiteer Enterprise Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) and Shenzhen Tepusi Enterprise Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership), with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.7%. In addition, we found that Jun Liu, the CEO has 6.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
深圳威馬新能源不是對沖基金所有。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是萬人春,持有19%的股份。第二大和第三大股東分別是深圳貝特爾企業管理合夥企業(有限合夥)和深圳特普思企業管理合夥企業(有限合夥),持有相等比例的股份,各爲7.7%。此外,我們發現CEO劉俊持有其名下6.5%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen VMAX New Energy
深圳威馬新能源的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shenzhen VMAX New Energy Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥4.6b stake in this CN¥12b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
根據我們最新的數據,內部持有者擁有深圳維馬斯新能源有限公司相當比例的股份。看到內部持有者在這家120億元人民幣的企業中擁有價值46億元人民幣的股份是非常有趣的。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看這幅展示內部持有者最近交易情況的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Shenzhen VMAX New Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有深圳維馬斯新能源26%的股份。雖然擁有這樣規模的所有權是相當可觀的,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 19%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同團體確實值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們發現第一太平有2個警示信號非常值得考慮,其中1個潛在嚴重。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shenzhen VMAX New Energy better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Shenzhen VMAX New Energy (at least 1 which is potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮到持有公司股份的不同群體一直是值得思考的事情。 但要更好地了解深圳VMAX新能母基,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,要考慮投資風險這個始終存在的幽靈。 我們已經確定了深圳VMAX新能母基的2個警告信號(至少其中1個可能嚴重),了解它們應該成爲您的投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。