Is Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) A Risky Investment?
Is Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) A Risky Investment?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (NYSE:EPAC) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
有人認爲,作爲投資者,用波動性而不是債務來思考風險是最好的方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過'波動性遠非風險的同義詞。因此,明智的資金都知道,債務(通常涉及破產)是評估公司風險性時非常重要的因素。重要的是,Enerpac Tool Group Corp.(紐交所:EPAC)的確有債務。但真正的問題在於這些債務是否使公司變得有風險。
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
一般來說,只有當一家公司無法通過籌資或自有現金流輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。在最壞的情況下,如果一家公司無法償還債權人的債務,它可能會破產。雖然這種情況並不太常見,但我們經常會看到負債累累的公司因貸款人迫使他們以破產價格籌集資本而永久稀釋股東。當然,負債的好處在於它通常代表了廉價的資本,特別是當它取代那些能夠以高回報率再投資的公司的稀釋時。考慮公司債務水平的第一步是將其現金和債務放在一起考慮。
How Much Debt Does Enerpac Tool Group Carry?
Enerpac Tool Group 承擔了多少債務?
As you can see below, Enerpac Tool Group had US$194.5m of debt at August 2024, down from US$214.1m a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$167.1m, its net debt is less, at about US$27.4m.
正如您下面所看到的,2024年8月,Enerpac Tool Group 的債務爲1億9450萬美元,較一年前的2億1410萬美元減少。然而,由於其有1億6710萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,大約爲2740萬美元。
How Strong Is Enerpac Tool Group's Balance Sheet?
Enerpac Tool Group的資產負債表有多強?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Enerpac Tool Group had liabilities of US$129.4m due within a year, and liabilities of US$256.0m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$167.1m as well as receivables valued at US$108.9m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$109.4m.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Enerpac Tool Group一年內應付的債務爲12940萬美元,之後到期的債務爲25600萬美元。 抵消這些債務的是,該公司擁有16710萬美元的現金以及價值10890萬美元的應收款項在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額超過現金和(短期)應收款項的總和約爲10940萬美元。
Given Enerpac Tool Group has a market capitalization of US$2.76b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse. Carrying virtually no net debt, Enerpac Tool Group has a very light debt load indeed.
考慮到Enerpac Tool Group的市值爲27.6億美元,很難相信這些負債會構成太大威脅。 話雖如此,很明顯我們應繼續監控其資產負債表,以防情況變得更糟。擁有幾乎沒有淨債務,Enerpac Tool Group的債務負擔確實非常輕。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
Enerpac Tool Group has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.18. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 10.9 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. Also good is that Enerpac Tool Group grew its EBIT at 15% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Enerpac Tool Group's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Enerpac Tool Group的淨債務與EBITDA比率僅爲0.18。其EBIt輕鬆覆蓋了利息支出,規模是10.9倍。因此,可以說它受到的債務威脅不比大象受到老鼠的威脅。而且值得一提的是,Enerpac Tool Group在過去一年裏將其EBIt增長了15%,進一步增加了其處理債務的能力。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。但最終決定Enerpac Tool Group未來能否保持健康財務狀況的,更多是未來盈利。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看一份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, Enerpac Tool Group produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 58% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務; 會計利潤並不能解決問題。 因此,值得檢查EBIt中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去三年裏,Enerpac Tool Group生成了堅實的自由現金流,等同於其EBIt的58%,與我們的預期相符。這份自由現金流使公司在適當時償還債務處於有利地位。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Enerpac Tool Group's impressive net debt to EBITDA implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its interest cover also supports that impression! Zooming out, Enerpac Tool Group seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Enerpac Tool Group, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.
欣慰的是,enerpac tool group的淨債務與EBITDA的比率令人印象深刻,這意味着它在債務方面佔據優勢。而好消息並不止於此,其利息支出也支持這一印象!總體來看,enerpac tool group似乎相當合理地使用債務;這也得到了我們的認可。畢竟,明智的槓桿可以提高股本回報率。隨着時間的推移,股價往往會跟隨每股收益,所以如果你對enerpac tool group感興趣,你可能希望點擊這裏查看其每股收益歷史的交互圖。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
當一切塵埃落定時,有時更容易專注於那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費查看零淨債務的成長股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。