Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) Is Making Moderate Use Of Debt
Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) Is Making Moderate Use Of Debt
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Green Plains Inc. (NASDAQ:GPRE) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
霍華德·馬克斯說得好,他說的不是擔心股價的波動,而是 「永久損失的可能性是我擔心的風險... 也是我認識的每位實際投資者所擔心的風險。」因此,很明顯,當你考慮任何給定股票的風險時,你需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務會使公司陷入困境。我們可以看到,格林普萊恩斯公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GPRE)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時危險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當企業無法輕易履行這些義務時,無論是通過自由現金流還是以誘人的價格籌集資金,債務和其他負債就會面臨風險。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能一無所有地離開。儘管這種情況不太常見,但我們經常看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以低價籌集資金。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理債務,而且對自己有利。當我們研究債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is Green Plains's Debt?
什麼是綠原的債務?
As you can see below, Green Plains had US$556.2m of debt at September 2024, down from US$653.6m a year prior. However, it also had US$227.5m in cash, and so its net debt is US$328.7m.
如下所示,截至2024年9月,綠原的債務爲5.562億美元,低於去年同期的6.536億美元。但是,它也有2.275億美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲3.287億美元。
How Healthy Is Green Plains' Balance Sheet?
Green Plains的資產負債表有多健康?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Green Plains had liabilities of US$316.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$504.9m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$227.5m as well as receivables valued at US$75.5m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$518.1m.
根據上次報告的資產負債表,格林普萊恩斯在12個月內到期的負債爲3.161億美元,12個月以後到期的負債爲5.049億美元。除這些債務外,它有2.275億美元的現金以及價值7,550萬美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額5.181億美元。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$734.8m. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Green Plains's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
相對於其7.348億美元的市值,這是一座巨大的槓桿率。這表明,如果公司需要迅速支撐資產負債表,股東將被嚴重稀釋。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,未來的收益將決定格林普萊恩斯未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Over 12 months, Green Plains made a loss at the EBIT level, and saw its revenue drop to US$2.6b, which is a fall of 26%. To be frank that doesn't bode well.
在過去的12個月中,Green Plains在息稅前利潤水平上出現虧損,收入降至26億美元,下降了26%。坦率地說,這並不是一個好兆頭。
Caveat Emptor
Caveat Emptor
Not only did Green Plains's revenue slip over the last twelve months, but it also produced negative earnings before interest and tax (EBIT). Indeed, it lost US$18m at the EBIT level. When we look at that and recall the liabilities on its balance sheet, relative to cash, it seems unwise to us for the company to have any debt. Quite frankly we think the balance sheet is far from match-fit, although it could be improved with time. We would feel better if it turned its trailing twelve month loss of US$20m into a profit. So we do think this stock is quite risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Green Plains .
在過去的十二個月中,Green Plains不僅收入下滑,而且還產生了負的利息和稅前收益(EBIT)。事實上,它在息稅前利潤水平上損失了1800萬美元。當我們審視這一點並回顧其資產負債表上相對於現金的負債時,對我們來說,公司有任何債務似乎是不明智的。坦率地說,我們認爲資產負債表遠非匹配,儘管可以隨着時間的推移而改善。如果它將過去十二個月的2000萬美元虧損轉化爲利潤,我們會感覺更好。因此,我們確實認爲這隻股票風險很大。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。爲此,你應該注意我們在格林普萊恩斯發現的1個警告標誌。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,通常最好專注於沒有淨負債的公司。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長的記錄)。它是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。