Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 73% of the Company
Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 73% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Caterpillar's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 由於機構持有大量股票,卡特彼勒的股票價格可能會受到他們的交易決策影響。
- 前25位股東擁有公司的50%股份。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
Every investor in Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每個在卡特彼勒公司(紐交所:CAT)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體,約佔73%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Caterpillar, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討卡特彼勒每種類型的股東,以下是相關圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Caterpillar?
機構持股情況對卡特彼勒公司意味着什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Caterpillar does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Caterpillar's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到卡特彼勒確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的較大比例。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審視過該股票,並且他們對其評價不錯。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,可能會導致股價快速下跌。因此,值得關注卡特彼勒的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Caterpillar is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.6% of shares outstanding. With 7.6% and 7.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, State Street Global Advisors, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。卡特彼勒並不被對沖基金持有。先鋒集團目前是最大的股東,持有9.6%的流通股份。道富銀行全球顧問公司和黑石集團分別持有7.6%和7.5%的流通股份,分別爲第二和第三大股東。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 25 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前25位股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司具有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Caterpillar
卡特彼勒公司的內部股東持股情況。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Caterpillar Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$371m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息顯示,卡特彼勒公司的內部人士持有不到1%的股份。由於公司規模如此龐大,我們不期望內部人士持有較大比例的股票。整體而言,他們擁有37100萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股份是好的,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資人,擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然該群體不能決定公司的政策,但它確實可以對公司的經營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Caterpillar (1 is a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同團體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,我們已識別出卡特彼勒的3個警告信號(其中1個有點令人不快),你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。