Dah Sing Banking Group Limited's (HKG:2356) Last Week's 4.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Public Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Dah Sing Banking Group Limited's (HKG:2356) Last Week's 4.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Public Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Dah Sing Banking Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- Dah Sing Financial Holdings Limited owns 74% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 公衆公司在大新銀行集團中的大量持股表明,他們在管理和業務策略上 collectively 擁有更大的發言權。
- 大新金融控股有限公司擁有公司74%的股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
If you want to know who really controls Dah Sing Banking Group Limited (HKG:2356), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 74% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制大新銀行集團有限公司( HKG:2356 ),那麼你需要看看它的股東名冊。持有最大份額的群體是擁有74%股份的公衆公司。換句話說,這個群體在對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或承受最大損失)。
As a result, public companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by HK$436m.
因此,上市公司整體在上週遭受了最高的損失,市值減少了43600萬港元。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Dah Sing Banking Group.
讓我們更仔細地看一下不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於大新銀行集團的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dah Sing Banking Group?
機構持股對大新銀行集團的意義是什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Dah Sing Banking Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Dah Sing Banking Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,大新銀行集團確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票中的一部分。這可能表明公司在投資界有一定的信譽。然而,依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可仍然需要謹慎。他們有時也會犯錯誤。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們在進行「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現錯誤時,多個參與者可能會競爭迅速賣出股票。對於一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到大新銀行集團的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的故事。
Dah Sing Banking Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Dah Sing Financial Holdings Limited with 74% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.8% and 1.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
大新銀行集團並不被對沖基金持有。根據我們的數據,最大股東是大新金融控股有限公司,持有74%的流通股份。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權利。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的2.8%和1.1%。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of Dah Sing Banking Group
大新銀行集團的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Dah Sing Banking Group Limited in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own HK$33m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己名義持有大新金融銀行集團有限公司不到1%的股份。 這是一家大公司,因此即使是小比例的持股也能在董事會與股東之間創造一致性。在這種情況下,內部人士持有價值3300萬港元的股份。 可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。 你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Dah Sing Banking Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆持有18%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對於大新金融銀行集團有一定的影響力。 這部分股份雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 74% of the Dah Sing Banking Group shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,公衆公司持有74%的大新金融銀行集團已發行股份。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一個戰略性持股。這些業務可能相似,或者相互合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Dah Sing Banking Group has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我覺得查看一家公司具體由誰擁有非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例 - 大新金融集團有 1 個警告信號 我們認爲你應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。