Ascentage Pharma Group International's (HKG:6855) Market Cap Dropped HK$1.1b Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt
Ascentage Pharma Group International's (HKG:6855) Market Cap Dropped HK$1.1b Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要見解
- Ascentage Pharma Group International's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 25 shareholders own 42% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- Ascentage Pharma Group International的重要零售投資者所有權表明主要決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
- 前25大股東擁有公司的42%股份。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
If you want to know who really controls Ascentage Pharma Group International (HKG:6855), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制着Ascentage Pharma Group International (HKG:6855),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到零售投資者擁有公司58%的所有權。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的利潤(或損失最大)。
And last week, retail investors endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 8.2%.
上週,零售投資者遭受了最大的損失,股票下跌了8.2%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ascentage Pharma Group International.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注安甄醫藥集團國際的不同所有權群體。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241114/0-7751e6149759d34f7308038694df1be3-0-b238eabd560265714d6cfe2fdc7e759b.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ascentage Pharma Group International?
機構投資者的持股情況如何反映安甄醫藥集團國際?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ascentage Pharma Group International. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ascentage Pharma Group International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在安甄醫藥集團國際中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。當多家機構擁有某股票時,總會存在它們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出問題時,多方可能會競相拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到安甄醫藥集團國際的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總有更多面。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241114/0-7751e6149759d34f7308038694df1be3-1-69aa376e98d46c77995aa8eff0df62aa.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ascentage Pharma Group International. Ascentage Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and SDIC Innovation Investment Management Co., Ltd. holds about 5.1% of the company stock.
我們注意到,對Ascentage Pharma Group International並無實質性的投資。Ascentage Limited目前是該公司最大的股東,持有16%的股份。武田製藥股份有限公司是第二大股東,擁有7.8%的普通股,而國藥創新投資管理有限公司持有該公司約5.1%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Ascentage Pharma Group International
Ascentage Pharma Group International內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Ascentage Pharma Group International. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own HK$8.3m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最近的數據表明,在Ascentage Pharma Group International內部持有的股份不到1%。但他們可能通過我們還未掌握的公司結構間接持有利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值830萬港元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但值得注意的是,可能需要檢查這些內部人員是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 58% stake in Ascentage Pharma Group International, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Ascentage Pharma Group International擁有相當大的58%股份,表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權水平賦予更廣泛公衆的投資者一些影響力,可以影響關鍵政策決策,如董事會構成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 5.1%, private equity firms could influence the Ascentage Pharma Group International board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
擁有5.1%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響武田製藥集團國際董事會。 有些人可能會喜歡這種情況,因爲股權投資有時是會迫使管理層對其負責。但有時,股權投資卻是在拋售股份,將公司上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 21%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的21%。從這個事實中很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查誰所擁有這些私人公司。有時,內部人員或其他相關方通過另外一個私人機構擁有公共公司的股份。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 7.8% of the Ascentage Pharma Group International shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
我們可以看到上市公司持有武田製藥集團國際發行股份的7.8%。 現在很難確定,但這可能表明它們有着交織的業務利益。 這可能是一個戰略性持股,因此值得關注這一領域的所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Ascentage Pharma Group International .
雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該了解我們在Ascentage Pharma Group International發現的2個警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。