OK Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001223) Adds CN¥392m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 75% Stake in That Gain
OK Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001223) Adds CN¥392m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 75% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over OK Science and Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 67% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- Ok Science and Technology的重要內部控制意味着對公司增長的既得利益。
- 共有2名投資者擁有該公司的67%所有權。
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of OK Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001223), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 75% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着深圳Ok Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:001223),重要的是要了解該企業的所有權結構。個別內部人士持有75%的股份,在公司中擁有最多股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.0b market cap following a 15% gain in the stock.
作爲結果,內幕人士在上週得分最高,因公司股價上漲15%,達到30億元人民幣的市值。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of OK Science and Technology.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看Ok科技的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OK Science and Technology?
機構持股告訴我們關於Ok科技的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Less than 5% of OK Science and Technology is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
Ok科技只有不到5%的股份被機構投資者持有。這表明一些基金正在關注該公司,但許多尚未購買其股票。如果業務在這一點上變得更強大,我們可能會看到更多機構渴望購買的情況。當多個機構投資者希望購買股票時,我們經常看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入軌跡(如下圖所示)可能是未來增長的一個指示,但沒有保證。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in OK Science and Technology. Jiansheng Hu is currently the largest shareholder, with 40% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 28% and 7.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Fusheng Hu, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我們注意到,對OK科技沒有意義的對沖基金投資。 胡建生目前是最大股東,持有40%的股份。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的28%和7.5%。 同時,作爲第二大股東的胡福生還擔任首席執行官。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 67% stake.
常州凱迪電氣的內部人擁有明顯的股權。它的市值僅爲2.8億元人民幣,內部人擁有6.25億元人民幣的股份。我們認爲這表現出與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人物可能創建了該業務。您可以單擊此處以查看那些內部人物是否一直在買賣。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。
Insider Ownership Of OK Science and Technology
OK科技的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of OK Science and Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥3.0b, that means they have CN¥2.2b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部人員擁有Ok科技有限公司的大部分所有權。這意味着他們可以集體爲公司做出決策。鑑於它的市值爲30億人民幣,這意味着他們持有價值22億人民幣的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可以免費查看他們是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over OK Science and Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆擁有21%的股權,主要由個人投資者組成,對Ok科技有限公司具有一定程度的影響力。雖然佔有量相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand OK Science and Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with OK Science and Technology (including 1 which shouldn't be ignored) .
考慮在公司擁有股份的不同群體始終是值得的。但要更好地了解Ok Science and Technology,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的Ok Science and Technology存在的4個警示信號(其中1個不容忽視)。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。