Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 69% of the Company
Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 69% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Provident Financial Services' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Provident Financial Services的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
- 前15名股東擁有公司50%的股份
- 業內人士最近賣出了
Every investor in Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 69% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Provident Financial Services, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:PFS)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有69%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Provident Financial Services.
在下圖中,我們放大了Provident Financial Services的不同所有權組。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Provident Financial Services?
關於公積金金融服務,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
Provident Financial Services already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Provident Financial Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
公積金服務已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Provident Financial Services過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Provident Financial Services. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在公積金金融服務中的股份不多。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的13%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的11%和5.9%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前15位的公司合併所有權爲50%,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Provident Financial Services
公積金服務的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
We can see that insiders own shares in Provident Financial Services, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$95m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有Provident Financial Services, Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值9500萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Provident Financial Services. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有公積金金融服務28%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Provident Financial Services (of which 1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) you should know about.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了 Provident Financial Services 的 5 個警告信號(其中 1 個讓我們有點不舒服!)你應該知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。