Despite Recent Sales, Expensify, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXFY) Insiders Still Control 33% of the Company
Despite Recent Sales, Expensify, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXFY) Insiders Still Control 33% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Expensify's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 內部人似乎對Expensify的增長有着極大的利益,這可以從他們龐大的所有權看出
- 前12名股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
Every investor in Expensify, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXFY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 33% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
Expensify, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXFY)的每位投資者都應意識到最強大的股東群體。我們看到個別內部人擁有公司33%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現下跌,則將損失最多)。
Even though insiders have sold shares recently, the group owns the most numbers of shares in the company and as a result benefitted the most after market cap rose US$78m last week.
儘管近期內部人士出售了股份,但該集團在公司中擁有最多股份,因此在市值上週上漲了7800萬美元后獲得了最大收益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Expensify, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解Expensify的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Expensify?
機構投資機構的持有情況對Expensify有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Expensify. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Expensify's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Expensify中擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過分依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。當多家機構共同持有一支股票時,總會存在他們在 '擁擠交易' 中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在歷史沒有增長記錄的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以查看Expensify的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更復雜的。
Expensify is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Steve McLaughlin with 13% of shares outstanding. David Barrett is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and Witold Stankiewicz holds about 7.3% of the company stock. David Barrett, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
Expensify不是由對沖基金擁有。從我們的數據中可以看出,最大的股東是史蒂夫·麥克勞克林,持有13%的股份。大衛·巴雷特是第二大股東,擁有7.8%的普通股,維托爾德·斯坦凱維奇持有約7.3%的公司股票。大衛·巴雷特是第二大股東,也是首席執行官。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
辛蒙斯第一國家銀行內部所有權
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Expensify
Expensify內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Expensify, Inc.. Insiders have a US$83m stake in this US$250m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來,內部持有Expensify,Inc.相當大比例的股份。內部人士在這家價值25000萬美元的公司中持有8300萬美元的股份。看到內部人士對業務如此投入真是太棒了。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否一直在購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Expensify. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Expensify持有31%的股份。儘管這一所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不協調,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 5.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股權投資機構擁有5.3%的股權,能夠在塑造企業戰略方面發揮作用,重點是價值創造。 一些投資者可能會因此而感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵幫助市場看到公司價值的策略。 或者,這些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Expensify better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Expensify that you should be aware of.
總是值得考慮公司股東群體的差異。但要更好地了解Expensify,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們已經確定了Expensify的4個警示信號,您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。