China Baoan Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000009) Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.2b Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt
China Baoan Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000009) Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.2b Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant control over China Baoan Group by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in China Baoan Group is 12%
- 散戶投資者對中國寶安集團的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
- 50% 的業務由前 13 名股東持有
- 中國寶安集團的機構所有權爲12%
Every investor in China Baoan Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000009) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
中國寶安集團有限公司(深圳證券交易所:000009)的每位投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲47%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, retail investors endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.3%.
上週,散戶投資者遭受了最大的損失,該股下跌了4.3%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of China Baoan Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究中國寶安集團的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Baoan Group?
關於中國寶安集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Baoan Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Baoan Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者持有中國寶安集團的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到中國寶安集團的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Baoan Group. Shenzhen Chengxing Investment Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 18% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 16% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對中國寶安集團進行有意義的投資。深圳成興投資有限公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的18%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的16%和5.2%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前13位的合計持有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of China Baoan Group
中國寶安集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of China Baoan Group Co., Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥32m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有中國寶安集團有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,我們確實注意到,內部人士有可能通過私營公司或其他公司結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值3200萬元人民幣的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司47%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 41%, of the China Baoan Group stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
私人公司似乎擁有中國寶安集團41%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that China Baoan Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit unpleasant...
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,中國寶安集團在我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,其中一個有點令人不快...
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。