After the Recent Decline, Tomson Group Limited (HKG:258) CEO Feng Hsu's Holdings Have Lost 8.6% of Their Value
After the Recent Decline, Tomson Group Limited (HKG:258) CEO Feng Hsu's Holdings Have Lost 8.6% of Their Value
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Tomson Group implies vested interests in company growth
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 湯臣集團的重大內部控制意味着對公司增長的利益關聯
- 共有2位投資者擁有江蘇長青新材料科技51%的所有權。
- 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。
A look at the shareholders of Tomson Group Limited (HKG:258) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 66% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看湯臣集團有限公司(HKG:258)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最強大。持有公司最多股份的團體,精確來說,大約佔66%,是內部個人。換句話說,該團體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by HK$455m.
因此,內部人士作爲一個整體在市值減少了45500萬港元后承受了最高損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Tomson Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討湯臣集團每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tomson Group?
缺乏機構持有量對湯臣集團意味着什麼?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我們不會看到機構投資者持有非常高風險、交易較少或非常小的公司的股票。雖然有時會看到大公司沒有機構在註冊表上,但這並不是特別普遍的情況。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Tomson Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
機構不持有某隻股票的原因有很多。最常見的原因是該公司相對於管理的基金規模太小,因此機構沒有必要仔細審視這家公司。或者,可能有某些因素使機構投資者遠離該公司。湯臣集團可能沒有機構尋找的那種過往業績,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究這個業務。

Tomson Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Feng Hsu with 36% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 15%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Note that two of the top three shareholders are also Senior Key Executive and Vice Chairman, respectively, once again pointing to significant ownership by company insiders.
湯臣集團不被對沖基金持有。通過我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是CEO徐峯,持有36%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有15%的流通股份。請注意,前三大股東中有兩位也是高級關鍵執行官和副董事長,這再次指向公司內部人士的顯著持股。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況
Insider Ownership Of Tomson Group
湯臣集團的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Tomson Group Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own HK$3.2b worth of shares in the HK$4.9b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有湯臣集團有限公司的絕大多數股份。這意味着他們可以集體爲公司做出決策。這意味着他們在這家市值49億港元的公司中持有價值32億港元的股份。這是相當重要的。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能想要(免費)了解他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,包括普通投資者,在公司擁有27%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.4%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據表明,私營公司持有該公司6.4%的股份。私營公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員通過持有私營公司的股份而非以個人身份對一家上市公司有利害關係。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但值得作爲進一步研究的一個方面。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tomson Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Tomson Group you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit concerning.
思考擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解湯臣集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如:我們發現湯臣集團有3個警告信號,你應該關注其中的2個,令人爲之擔憂。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。