Pulse Biosciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PLSE) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Robert Duggan Sees Holdings Value Fall by 4.8% Following Recent Drop
Pulse Biosciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PLSE) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Robert Duggan Sees Holdings Value Fall by 4.8% Following Recent Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Pulse Biosciences' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- Robert Duggan owns 69% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 內部人士似乎對pulse biosciences的增長有很大的利益關係,因爲他們的持股比例相當可觀。
- 羅伯特·杜根擁有該公司69%的股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
A look at the shareholders of Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:PLSE) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看pulse biosciences, inc.(納斯達克:PLSE)的股東,可以讓我們知道哪個群體最有影響力。我們可以看到,個人內部人士在公司中擁有71%的股份。這就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大的好處(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.8%.
上週,內部人士遭受了最大的損失,因爲股票下跌了4.8%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pulse Biosciences, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地研究一下pulse biosciences的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pulse Biosciences?
機構持有情況告訴我們關於pulse biosciences什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pulse Biosciences. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pulse Biosciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在pulse biosciences中擁有相當份額。這在某種程度上表明了專業投資者的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時候也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變了對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面pulse biosciences的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pulse Biosciences. Our data suggests that Robert Duggan, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 69%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 1.9% and 1.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到對pulse biosciences的對沖基金沒有顯著投資。我們的數據顯示,羅伯特·杜根(Robert Duggan),也是公司的頂級關鍵高管,持有最多的股份,達到69%。當內部聯繫人持有大量公司股票時,投資者會認爲這是一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人員願意讓他們的財富與公司的未來綁在一起。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有1.9%和1.5%的流通股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Pulse Biosciences
pulse biosciences的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Pulse Biosciences, Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of US$1.1b, that means insiders have a whopping US$760m worth of shares in their own names. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.
內部人士似乎持有超過一半的pulse biosciences, Inc. 股票。這給了他們很多權力。考慮到它的市值爲11億美金,這意味着內部人士持有的股票價值高達76000萬美元。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。你可能想知道他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Pulse Biosciences. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有pulse biosciences 20%的股份。這種規模的持有,雖然相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Pulse Biosciences (including 1 which is potentially serious) .
我發現研究一個公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲取洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解我們發現的有關pulse biosciences的3個警告信號(其中1個可能嚴重)。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。