Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good Vital Farms' (NASDAQ:VITL) Earnings Are
Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good Vital Farms' (NASDAQ:VITL) Earnings Are
Vital Farms, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:VITL) earnings announcement last week was disappointing for investors, despite the decent profit numbers. We did some digging and actually think they are being unnecessarily pessimistic.
Vital Farms, Inc.s(納斯達克股票代碼:VITL)上週公佈的業績令投資者失望,儘管利潤數字不錯。我們進行了一些挖掘,實際上認爲他們過於悲觀。
Zooming In On Vital Farms' Earnings
放大重要農場的收益
One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.
用於衡量公司將其利潤轉換爲自由現金流(FCF)的情況的一個關鍵財務比率是應計比率。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先從一段時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均運營資產。這個比率告訴我們,一家公司的利潤中有多少沒有自由現金流的支持。
That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.
這意味着負應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明該公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所暗示的要多。雖然正應計比率表明非現金利潤達到一定水平不是問題,但高應計比率可以說是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。這是因爲一些學術研究表明,高應計率往往會導致利潤下降或利潤增長減弱。
Over the twelve months to September 2024, Vital Farms recorded an accrual ratio of -0.12. That implies it has good cash conversion, and implies that its free cash flow solidly exceeded its profit last year. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$61m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$50.0m. Vital Farms' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. Notably, the company has issued new shares, thus diluting existing shareholders and reducing their share of future earnings.
在截至2024年9月的十二個月中,Vital Farms的應計比率爲-0.12。這意味着它具有良好的現金轉化率,也意味着其去年的自由現金流穩步超過了利潤。換句話說,它在此期間產生了6100萬美元的自由現金流,使其報告的5000萬美元利潤相形見絀。Vital Farms的自由現金流比去年有所改善,總體而言,這是值得期待的。值得注意的是,該公司發行了新股,從而稀釋了現有股東並減少了他們在未來收益中所佔的份額。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以點擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。
To understand the value of a company's earnings growth, it is imperative to consider any dilution of shareholders' interests. In fact, Vital Farms increased the number of shares on issue by 5.3% over the last twelve months by issuing new shares. That means its earnings are split among a greater number of shares. To celebrate net income while ignoring dilution is like rejoicing because you have a single slice of a larger pizza, but ignoring the fact that the pizza is now cut into many more slices. Check out Vital Farms' historical EPS growth by clicking on this link.
要了解公司收益增長的價值,必須考慮削弱股東的利益。實際上,Vital Farms通過發行新股,在過去十二個月中將已發行股票數量增加了5.3%。這意味着其收益將分配給更多的股票。在慶祝淨收入的同時忽略稀釋就像歡欣鼓舞,因爲你只有一片更大的披薩,但卻忽略了披薩現在被切成更多片的事實。點擊此鏈接,查看Vital Farms的歷史每股收益增長。
How Is Dilution Impacting Vital Farms' Earnings Per Share (EPS)?
稀釋如何影響重要農場的每股收益(EPS)?
As it happens, we don't know how much the company made or lost three years ago, because we don't have the data. The good news is that profit was up 144% in the last twelve months. On the other hand, earnings per share are only up 136% over the same period. And so, you can see quite clearly that dilution is influencing shareholder earnings.
碰巧的是,我們不知道該公司三年前賺了多少或損失了多少,因爲我們沒有數據。好消息是,在過去的十二個月中,利潤增長了144%。另一方面,同期每股收益僅增長了136%。因此,你可以清楚地看到稀釋正在影響股東收益。
Changes in the share price do tend to reflect changes in earnings per share, in the long run. So it will certainly be a positive for shareholders if Vital Farms can grow EPS persistently. However, if its profit increases while its earnings per share stay flat (or even fall) then shareholders might not see much benefit. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.
從長遠來看,股價的變化往往會反映每股收益的變化。因此,如果Vital Farms能夠持續增長每股收益,這對股東來說肯定是積極的。但是,如果其利潤增加而每股收益保持不變(甚至下降),那麼股東可能看不到太多好處。出於這個原因,你可以說從長遠來看,每股收益比淨收入更重要,前提是目標是評估公司的股價是否可能上漲。
Our Take On Vital Farms' Profit Performance
我們對重要農場利潤表現的看法
At the end of the day, Vital Farms is diluting shareholders which will dampen earnings per share growth, but its accrual ratio showed it can back up its profits with free cash flow. After taking into account all these factors, we think that Vital Farms' statutory results are a decent reflection of its underlying earnings power. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Vital Farms you should be aware of.
歸根結底,Vital Farms正在稀釋股東,這將抑制每股收益的增長,但其應計比率表明它可以通過自由現金流來支持利潤。在考慮了所有這些因素之後,我們認爲Vital Farms的法定業績很好地反映了其潛在的盈利能力。有鑑於此,如果你想對公司進行更多分析,了解所涉及的風險至關重要。一個很好的例子:我們發現了 Vital Farms 的 1 個警告信號,你應該注意。
Our examination of Vital Farms has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
我們對Vital Farms的審查側重於某些可能使其收益看起來好於實際的因素。但是,如果你能夠將注意力集中在細節上,總會有更多的事情需要發現。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 「關注資金」,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到這份擁有高股本回報率的公司的免費集合,或者這份內部所有權高的股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。