share_log

The Returns At Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) Aren't Growing

The Returns At Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) Aren't Growing

洛克希德馬丁(紐交所:LMT)的回報並未增長
Simply Wall St ·  14:41

If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Looking at Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT), it does have a high ROCE right now, but lets see how returns are trending.

如果我們想找到一隻可以長期成倍增長的股票,我們應該尋找哪些潛在趨勢?除其他外,我們希望看到兩件事:首先,動用資本回報率(ROCE)的增長,其次,公司的資本使用量擴大。如果你看到這一點,這通常意味着它是一家擁有良好商業模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。從洛克希德·馬丁公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:LMT)來看,它目前的投資回報率確實很高,但讓我們看看回報率的趨勢。

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

了解資本使用回報率 (ROCE)

Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Lockheed Martin:

爲了澄清一下你是否不確定,ROCE是評估公司從投資於其業務的資本中獲得多少稅前收入(按百分比計算)的指標。分析師使用這個公式來計算洛克希德·馬丁公司的利潤:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益(EBIT)÷(總資產-流動負債)

0.24 = US$9.0b ÷ (US$56b - US$18b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).

0.24 = 90億美元 ÷(560億美元至180億美元)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。

So, Lockheed Martin has an ROCE of 24%. In absolute terms that's a great return and it's even better than the Aerospace & Defense industry average of 9.7%.

因此,洛克希德·馬丁公司的投資回報率爲24%。從絕對值來看,這是一個不錯的回報,甚至比航空航天和國防行業9.7%的平均水平還要好。

big
NYSE:LMT Return on Capital Employed November 15th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LMT 2024年11月15日動用資本回報率

In the above chart we have measured Lockheed Martin's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Lockheed Martin .

在上圖中,我們將洛克希德·馬丁公司先前的投資回報率與之前的表現進行了對比,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果您有興趣,可以在我們的洛克希德·馬丁公司免費分析師報告中查看分析師的預測。

What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us

ROCE 的趨勢能告訴我們什麼

There hasn't been much to report for Lockheed Martin's returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. This tells us the company isn't reinvesting in itself, so it's plausible that it's past the growth phase. Although current returns are high, we'd need more evidence of underlying growth for it to look like a multi-bagger going forward. This probably explains why Lockheed Martin is paying out 46% of its income to shareholders in the form of dividends. Unless businesses have highly compelling growth opportunities, they'll typically return some money to shareholders.

洛克希德·馬丁公司的回報率及其資本利用水平沒有太多可報告的,因爲這兩個指標在過去五年中一直保持穩定。這告訴我們該公司沒有對自己進行再投資,因此它已經過了增長階段是合理的。儘管目前的回報率很高,但我們需要更多潛在增長的證據,才能讓它在未來看起來像一個多袋子。這也許可以解釋爲什麼洛克希德·馬丁公司以股息的形式將其收入的46%支付給股東。除非企業有極具吸引力的增長機會,否則他們通常會向股東返還一些錢。

Our Take On Lockheed Martin's ROCE

我們對洛克希德·馬丁公司ROCE的看法

Although is allocating it's capital efficiently to generate impressive returns, it isn't compounding its base of capital, which is what we'd see from a multi-bagger. Although the market must be expecting these trends to improve because the stock has gained 58% over the last five years. But if the trajectory of these underlying trends continue, we think the likelihood of it being a multi-bagger from here isn't high.

儘管它正在有效地分配資本以產生可觀的回報,但它並沒有鞏固其資本基礎,正如我們從一個多口袋公司那裏看到的那樣。儘管市場必須預期這些趨勢會有所改善,因爲該股在過去五年中上漲了58%。但是,如果這些潛在趨勢的發展軌跡繼續下去,我們認爲從現在起它成爲多股勢力的可能性並不高。

One more thing, we've spotted 1 warning sign facing Lockheed Martin that you might find interesting.

還有一件事,我們在洛克希德·馬丁公司面前發現了一個警告標誌,你可能會覺得有趣。

If you'd like to see other companies earning high returns, check out our free list of companies earning high returns with solid balance sheets here.

如果您想看到其他公司獲得高回報,請在此處查看我們的免費高回報且資產負債表穩健的公司名單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論