While Individual Investors Own 31% of China Everbright Bank Company Limited (SHSE:601818), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 51% Ownership
While Individual Investors Own 31% of China Everbright Bank Company Limited (SHSE:601818), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 51% Ownership
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- China Everbright Bank's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
- 18% of China Everbright Bank is held by Institutions
- 中國光大銀行擁有大量私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 共有2位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲54%
- 中國光大銀行18%的股份由機構持有
If you want to know who really controls China Everbright Bank Company Limited (SHSE:601818), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 51% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着中國光大銀行股份有限公司(SHSE: 601818),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。私營公司擁有51%的股份,擁有該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 31% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,個人投資者佔公司股東的31%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of China Everbright Bank.
在下圖中,我們放大了中國光大銀行的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Everbright Bank?
關於中國光大銀行,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Everbright Bank. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Everbright Bank's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所見,機構投資者在中國光大銀行擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到中國光大銀行的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Everbright Bank. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is China Everbright Group Ltd. with 47% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 3.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對中國光大銀行進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是中國光大集團有限公司,已發行股份的47%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.1%和3.9%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前兩位股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of China Everbright Bank
中國光大銀行的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我們注意到,我們的數據並未顯示任何董事會成員個人持有股份。鑑於我們沒有獲得內部所有權,我們可能缺少數據。因此,在這裏評估首席執行官的薪酬和任期會很有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in China Everbright Bank. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有中國光大銀行31%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 51%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的51%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that China Everbright Bank is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,中國光大銀行在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。