Positive Week for Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910) Institutional Investors Who Lost 18% Over the Past Year
Positive Week for Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910) Institutional Investors Who Lost 18% Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Samsonite International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構在新秀麗國際的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有着重要影響
- 總共有11家投資者擁有該公司52%的所有權
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
If you want to know who really controls Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 74% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制着Samsonite International S.A.(HKG:1910),那麼您必須看公司股東註冊表的構成。持有公司股份數量最多的群體,準確地說佔了大約74%,是機構。換句話說,這個群體將從他們投資公司中獲得最多(或者失去最多)的利益。
Institutional investors would appreciate the 5.9% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 18%.
機構投資者將會對上週股價上漲5.9%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的損失總計令人失望的18%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Samsonite International, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Samsonite International每一類所有者,首先從以下圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Samsonite International?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Samsonite International的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Samsonite International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Samsonite International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到Samsonite International確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,就會存在一種風險,即它們會形成『擁擠交易』。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以查看下面Samsonite International的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Samsonite International. The company's largest shareholder is E Fund Management Co., Ltd., with ownership of 9.5%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.2% and 6.0% of the stock.
機構投資者擁有超過公司50%的股份,因此他們可能共同對董事會決定產生強烈影響。對新秀麗國際來說,對沖基金並不持有太多股份。該公司最大的股東是易方達基金管理有限公司,持股比例爲9.5%。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約6.2%和6.0%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 52% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地觀察我們的所有權數據可以發現,前11大股東持有公司的52%股份,意味着沒有單一股東持有大部分股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Samsonite International
新秀麗國際的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Samsonite International S.A.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around HK$1.2b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以報告,內部人確實擁有新秀麗國際S.A.的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的明顯聯盟通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約12億港元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人員有這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人員最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Samsonite International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆擁有21%的股權,主要由個人投資者組成,對新秀麗國際有一定程度的影響力。儘管擁有的股權規模相當可觀,但這可能不足以改變公司政策,如果決定與其他大股東不一致的話。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Samsonite International .
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的新秀麗國際存在的2個警示信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。