GCL Energy TechnologyLtd (SZSE:002015) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
GCL Energy TechnologyLtd (SZSE:002015) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. Put simply, these types of businesses are compounding machines, meaning they are continually reinvesting their earnings at ever-higher rates of return. However, after investigating GCL Energy TechnologyLtd (SZSE:002015), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.
你知道有哪些財務指標可以提供潛在大牛股的線索嗎?首先,我們想要識別增長的資本回報率(ROCE),以及不斷增加的已投入資本的基礎。簡單來說,這類企業是複利機器,意味着它們不斷以越來越高的回報率再投資收益。然而,在調查了GCL能源科技有限公司(SZSE:002015)後,我們認爲它當前的趨勢不符合大牛股的特點。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本利用率(ROCE)是什麼?
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on GCL Energy TechnologyLtd is:
如果你以前沒有使用過ROCE,它衡量的是公司從投入的資本中生成的「回報」(稅前利潤)。針對GCL能源科技有限公司,這個計算的公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.045 = CN¥1.3b ÷ (CN¥41b - CN¥12b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.045 = CN¥13億 ÷ (CN¥410億 - CN¥12b)(根據截至2024年9月的過去十二個月數據)。
Thus, GCL Energy TechnologyLtd has an ROCE of 4.5%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Renewable Energy industry average of 5.6%.
因此,GCL能源科技有限公司的ROCE是4.5%。歸根結底,這是一個較低的回報,低於可再生能源行業平均的5.6%。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241116/0-113895a3ff2ebdc5a194e1066efcaca0-0-59ef9c679355d5d4305796a2018ae1fe.png/big)
Above you can see how the current ROCE for GCL Energy TechnologyLtd compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for GCL Energy TechnologyLtd .
在上面你可以看到GCL能源科技有限公司當前的資本回報率(ROCE)與其以前的資本回報率相比的情況,但從過去的表現能得到的信息有限。如果你感興趣,可以查看我們關於GCL能源科技有限公司的免費分析師報告中的分析師預測。
What Can We Tell From GCL Energy TechnologyLtd's ROCE Trend?
我們能從GCL能源科技有限公司的ROCE趨勢中得出什麼結論?
In terms of GCL Energy TechnologyLtd's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Over the last five years, returns on capital have decreased to 4.5% from 9.5% five years ago. Given the business is employing more capital while revenue has slipped, this is a bit concerning. If this were to continue, you might be looking at a company that is trying to reinvest for growth but is actually losing market share since sales haven't increased.
就GCL能源科技有限公司的歷史ROCE變動而言,趨勢並不理想。在過去五年中,資本回報率已從五年前的9.5%降至4.5%。考慮到該業務投入了更多資本,而營業收入卻有所下降,這讓人有些擔憂。如果這種情況持續下去,您可能會看到一家試圖重新投資以實現增長但實際上市場份額在流失的公司,因爲銷售沒有增加。
What We Can Learn From GCL Energy TechnologyLtd's ROCE
我們能從GCL能源科技有限公司的ROCE中學到什麼
We're a bit apprehensive about GCL Energy TechnologyLtd because despite more capital being deployed in the business, returns on that capital and sales have both fallen. But investors must be expecting an improvement of sorts because over the last five yearsthe stock has delivered a respectable 51% return. Regardless, we don't feel too comfortable with the fundamentals so we'd be steering clear of this stock for now.
我們對GCL能源科技有限公司有些擔憂,因爲儘管業務中投入了更多資本,但資本回報和銷售額都下降了。但是,投資者必須期待某種改善,因爲在過去五年中,股票提供了可觀的51%回報。無論如何,我們對基本面並不是太滿意,所以目前我們會避開這隻股票。
Since virtually every company faces some risks, it's worth knowing what they are, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for GCL Energy TechnologyLtd (of which 2 are significant!) that you should know about.
由於幾乎每家公司都面臨一些風險,了解這些風險是值得的,我們已經發現GCL能源科技有限公司有3個警告信號(其中2個是重大的!)您應該知道。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想尋找財務狀況良好、回報卓越的實力強企業,可以免費查看以下公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。