share_log

CEO David Shan, Massimo Group's (NASDAQ:MAMO) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 35% After Recent Drop

CEO David Shan, Massimo Group's (NASDAQ:MAMO) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 35% After Recent Drop

Massimo集團(納斯達克股票代碼:MAMO)最大股東CEO David Shan最近股價下跌後看到持有股份價值下降35%
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/16 20:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Massimo Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • The largest shareholder of the company is David Shan with a 78% stake
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • Massimo集團的重要內部控制意味着對公司增長的利益關係。
  • 該公司最大的股東是大衛·山,持有78%的股份。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

A look at the shareholders of Massimo Group (NASDAQ:MAMO) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 78% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

研究Massimo集團(納斯達克:MAMO)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。擁有78%股份,個人內部人士在公司中擁有最多的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者有下跌),該群體將獲得最大利益(或者損失最多)。

And following last week's 35% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

在上週35%的股價下跌之後,內部人遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Massimo Group.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Massimo Group的什麼。

big
NasdaqCM:MAMO Ownership Breakdown November 16th 2024
NasdaqCM:MAMO所有權拆分2024年11月16日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Massimo Group?

機構股東缺失對Massimo Group有何影響?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們不會看到機構投資者持有非常高風險、交易較少或非常小的公司的股票。雖然有時會看到大公司沒有機構在註冊表上,但這並不是特別普遍的情況。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Massimo Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

機構不持有股票有多種解釋。最常見的是,該公司相對於資產管理下的基金太小,因此機構不會費心仔細研究該公司。另一方面,專業投資者可能在避開一家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是他們的最佳投資對象。Massimo Group可能沒有機構所追尋的過去表現,或者可能他們只是沒有仔細研究過這家公司的業務。

big
NasdaqCM:MAMO Earnings and Revenue Growth November 16th 2024
納斯達克CM:MAMO盈利和營收增長2024年11月16日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Massimo Group. The company's CEO David Shan is the largest shareholder with 78% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have significant control over the outcome or future of the company, which is why insider ownership is usually looked upon favourably by prospective buyers. Asia International Securities Exchange Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Yunhao Chen holds about 0.1% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Yunhao Chen is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到,對於Massimo Group,對沖基金沒有持有意義重大的投資。 該公司的CEO大衛·尚是最大的股東,持有78%的流通股份。這基本上意味着他們對公司的結果或未來具有重大的控制權,這就是爲什麼內部持股通常被有意向的買家視爲積極的原因。亞洲國際證券交易所有限公司是第二大股東,持有10%的普通股,陳雲豪持有約0.1%的公司股份。有趣的是,第三大股東陳雲豪也是董事會成員,再次表明公司的頂級股東中存在強大的內部持股。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。分析師觀點也可以達到相同的目的。我們的信息表明,這隻股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,所以它可能不是很出名。

Insider Ownership Of Massimo Group

Massimo集團的內部持有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Massimo Group. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$134m stake in this US$172m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息顯示,內部持有Massimo Group超過一半的股份。這使他們有效地控制着公司。因此,他們在這家價值17200萬美元的公司中持有13400萬美元的股份。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看內部股東最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Massimo Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有12%股權的普通大衆,大部分由個人投資者組成,在Massimo Group中有一定程度的影響力。儘管擁有相當大的所有權,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 10%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司10%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過在私人公司的持股,而不是以個人身份對上市公司有利益。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Massimo Group has 2 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.

我發現查看公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。拿風險來說 - Massimo Group有2個警示信號(還有1個讓我們感到有些不舒服的),我們認爲您應該知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論