With 5.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Ambarella, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMBA) 7.7% Stock Price Decline
With 5.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Ambarella, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMBA) 7.7% Stock Price Decline
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Ambarella's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Ambarella的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
- 51% 的業務由前 15 名股東持有
- 內部人士最近的銷售情況
If you want to know who really controls Ambarella, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMBA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着Ambarella, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:AMBA),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$196m last week. However, the 5.3% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
上週該公司的市值下降了1.96億美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,5.3%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ambarella, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Ambarella的每種所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ambarella?
關於安巴雷拉,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
Ambarella already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ambarella, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
安巴雷拉已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Ambarella過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Ambarella is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 4.7% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Feng-Ming Wang is the owner of 1.8% of the company's shares.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。安霸不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有權爲11%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.4%和4.7%的股份。此外,首席執行官王峯明持有公司1.8%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前15名股東的合併所有權爲51%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Ambarella
Ambarella 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Ambarella, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$139m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有Ambarella, Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值1.39億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司11%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Ambarella is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,Ambarella在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警告信號,您應該知道...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。