Chipsea Technologies (Shenzhen) Corp. (SHSE:688595) CEO Guojian Lu, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 12% Reduction in Holdings Value
Chipsea Technologies (Shenzhen) Corp. (SHSE:688595) CEO Guojian Lu, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 12% Reduction in Holdings Value
Key Insights
主要見解
- Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen)'s significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 55% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Institutions own 25% of Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen)
- 芯海科技(深圳)的顯著內部持股顯示了對公司擴張的內在興趣
- 55%的業務由前兩大股東持有。
- 機構持有芯海科技(深圳)25%的股份
Every investor in Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen) Corp. (SHSE:688595) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位投資者在芯海科技(深圳)corp.(SHSE:688595)中都應了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個人內部人士持有公司37%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲得最大利益(或者如果股市下跌,將損失最多)。
And following last week's 12% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
在上週的12%股價下跌之後,內部人員遭受了最大的虧損。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen).
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於芯海科技(深圳)的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen)?
機構持股能告訴我們關於芯海科技(深圳)什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen), (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
芯海科技(深圳)已經在股東名冊上有機構的存在。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好謹慎對待依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯誤。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,出現大幅股價下跌的情況並不罕見。因此,值得檢查芯海科技(深圳)過去的盈利軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要考慮其他因素。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen). The company's CEO Guojian Lu is the largest shareholder with 37% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 19% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
我們注意到對Chipsea Technologies(深圳)的對沖基金沒有重要投資。公司的首席執行官魯國健是最大的股東,持有37%的流通股份。作爲對比,第二大股東持有約19%的流通股份,第三大股東的持股比例爲3.7%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.
股東登記簿的更詳細研究顯示,前兩名股東中有2人持有該公司約55%的股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen)
Chipsea Technologies(深圳)的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen) Corp.. Insiders have a CN¥1.4b stake in this CN¥3.8b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部人士擁有芯海科技(深圳)corp.的一個重要股份。內部人士在這家價值38億人民幣的公司中持有14億人民幣的股份。看到內部人士如此投入於業務非常好。值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen). While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆持有18%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對芯海科技(深圳)有一定的影響力。雖然這種規模的股份可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 19%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司股份的19%。私營公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過私營公司持有公共公司的利益,而不是作爲個人。雖然很難得出任何大膽的結論,但它值得作爲進一步研究的領域加以注意。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Chipsea Technologies (shenzhen) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮不同的股東群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如,投資風險始終存在。我們已經識別出芯海科技(深圳)的一條警告信號,理解這些信號應該是你投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。